removing ~/.config/monitors.xml worked for me too.
Question is, what is it there for? What are the consequences of removing it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to nvidia-graphics-drivers in Ubuntu.
How would I specify the post-release fglrx from apt-get install ?
I also have the problem that I can install the older (pre-release I guess)
driver, but the post-release fails.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in
Can confirm that for me,
Ubuntu 10.10
ATI Radeon 3470 HD mobility
This seems to be fixed, as of 2010/12/14
using all latest installs and updates from ubuntu maverick install.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in
Yes, but I think I agree with Nicolas in saying that would shouldn't
lessen the status of this bug, since many people can't live with the
free driver due to power management concerns.
A Bug is a bug, and as bugs go, this is still a whopper,
until it is fixed.
Lets hope soon.
--
[M76] [ubuntu
@Nicolas Delvau
No, Not fixed yet. However, does the fact that the free driver works
in Lucid provide hope that the fglrx driver (the next version
available for lucid) will also be improved ?
To be honest, with people passing patches to the x-server around, it
doesn't give me confidence that it
ammendment for my above comment: sorry, I meant I'd had problems with
jaunty and karmic (not lucid and karmic).
--
[M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop
effects enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186
You received this bug notification because you
My report, having tested the lucid alpha 3 liveCD
Reports are good!
I am running a sony vaio, with ATI Radeon Mobility HD3470 graphics.
I have also suffered with the minimize/maximize problem with lucid and
karmic.
With Lucid alpha 3, LiveCD, I boot up (I have not installed it) from CD,
and
@Morten Frisch
Can it be true! A real fix in time for lucid! That will make me very
happy. I am sorry that I am not in a position to have been in a position
to help on this issue, but will be very glad when I see it fixed.
However, can you confirm what you mean?
ditch the fglrx driver - Are you
I have a very stupid question.
I can't figure out how I know which version of Catalyst I have
running. I can't find where it tells me a version such as 9.11 or
whatever...
--
[M76] [ubuntu 9.04] [ubuntu 9.10] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop
effects enabled
question: How can a bug report which is directly referenced to by an
official Ubuntu community help page
(https://help.ubuntu.com/community/KarmicUpgrades) be listed as
'Invalid' ?
--
upgrade breaks graphic drivers and x, preventing login or startx
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/464591
You
just watch it get rejected for 10.4 too!
On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:05 AM, krona kr...@krona.f2s.com wrote:
I can't beleive this was rejected for Karmic. If the driver is fglrx
then do not do the other bug fix code that causes the performance
problem! I installed the latest fglrx driver from
@Vancouverite
Just to clarify what you mean;
First you say you had memory leaks with no-back-fill.
then switched to backclear, and still had memory leaks.
Then switched to the default that ships with Karmic koala - still memory
leaks
So what did you do differently to now have no memory leak?
, but the graphics driver ?
So, it should be possible to achieve fast (normal) unminimizing AND no
memory leak. And that is what vancouverite has achieved?
2009/11/11 José Tomás Atria jtat...@gmail.com
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 2:44 PM, svaens sva...@gmail.com wrote:
So what did you do differently to now have
Thank you van,
I use currently the open source radeon driver 2D (on my HD 3470 mobility) to
escape the unminimize problem. It would be a shame for me to install the
backclear patch and still be stuck using the 2D version because of a memory
leak.
That paraview affects the memory leak like that
Yes, that was also my understanding of 'incomplete'. And I asked precisely
because I was afraid that its status of 'incomplete' would see it being left
out by Ubuntu developers.
Could the powers that be reconsider the status of this bug?, as I believe
there is plenty of information to list it as
Incomplete ?
What else is needed for this bug to be confirmed? I don't understand.
when a bug is marked as 'Incomplete' it typically doesn't get worked on, I
believe.
Please explain.
--
[M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
Good to know it is fixed in 9.10. In the meanwhile, i'm using abiword.
Impressed by the speed I've been missing in o-o
--
[R420] system freezes when starting openoffice writer
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/371296
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is
deb package?
What deb package, and what is the link?
Good for jaunty? Or only Karmic ?
thanks!
On Wed, Oct 7, 2009 at 7:35 PM, Xavier zheka.p...@gmail.com wrote:
Downloaded deb packages from launchpad resource. Installed them and now lag
dissapeared.
Only problem in the hibernate... But
Hi all,
I have a couple questions before I jump into this.
@Felix
You mentioned this is a patch against the Xorg version 1.6.3 included in
Karmic.
Does that mean I should not use it in Jaunty with Xorg 1.6.0 ?
Also, a subscriber to this bug, Michel, mentioned above that he was able to
solve
As far as I can tell, I wouldn't be happy if this 'patch' was considered the
fix,
I thought i've read reports that with the nobackfill patch, while the delay
is gone, a huge memory leak issue replaces it.
Or have I understood the previous posts incorrectly.
Please correct me if so. But it is my
I have also voted for this bug at AMD.
--
[M76] [ubuntu 9.04] slow unminimizing with ati card and desktop effects enabled
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/351186
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu-X,
which is subscribed to fglrx-installer in ubuntu.
@Dag Stenstad
Perhaps I have misunderstood previous posts regarding this issue,
But I thought the xserver-no-backfill was the workaround/fix to remove the 3
second lag on unminimize.
And you say you upgraded to Xorg from xserver-no-backfill.
Do you still have the delay, using Normal or Extra
I would like confirmation that this is a work-around rather than a fix,
as something that reduces 3D performance, doesn't sound like moving forward.
Is this something that we put up with for now (to get a reasonably working
desktop) until a real fix comes along?
Or is this considered a
Confirmed on Sony Vaio, ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3470.
So, is there a final fix for this? I would prefer not to patch something
just to have the proper solution rolled out a couple weeks later.
Or, what is the consensus on this. What is the correct thing to do here?
Would the development at
24 matches
Mail list logo
