Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

2018-06-13 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, čt 7. 6. 2018 v 18:11 odesílatel Sebastiaan Couwenberg napsal: > Have you tried using both? --s-o-c is a pbuilder option whereas -S is a > dpkg-buildpackage option. do you mean gbp buildpackage -S -sa --git-pbuilder --git-dist=${DIST}-ubuntugis-experimental or gbp buildpackage

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

2018-06-13 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, st 13. 6. 2018 v 23:33 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: I tried to compare files which are send to Launchpad (bionic vs xenial), I found small difference which can be related: diff -u grass_7.4.1-1~bionic1_source.changes grass_7.4.1-1~xenial1_source.changes ... -

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

2018-06-13 Thread Martin Landa
Hi, st 13. 6. 2018 v 23:42 odesílatel Martin Landa napsal: > _amd64.buildinfo file is generated just for bionic and not for xenial. Ma I created package for bionic once more and before uploading removed from grass_7.4.1-1~bionic2_source.changes any records about

Re: [Ubuntu] Mismatch in binaryfulness. (arch) False != (files) True

2018-06-13 Thread Sebastiaan Couwenberg
On 06/13/2018 11:59 PM, Martin Landa wrote: > I just wonder why _amd64.buildinfo file is created just in > ubuntugis/bionic branch and not in ubuntugis/xenial branch. Bearing in > mind that I used exactly the same commands to produce source packages > for upload in the both branches. Because