[PATCH] dl: fix dlsym lookups with RTLD_NEXT

2013-01-08 Thread Timo Teräs
The current code for dlsym() when invoked with RTLD_NEXT lookup searches for the module where it's being called from, and executes the _dl_find_hash only for the next module in the chain. However, if the looked symbol is not there, the rest of the modules are not checked. Generally this is not a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc++-0.2.4 released

2013-01-08 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Tue, May 29, 2012 at 06:35:13PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: Bernhard, All, On Saturday 26 May 2012 00:22:35 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: On Fri, May 25, 2012 at 11:58:13PM +0200, Yann E. MORIN wrote: I believe this would be good, at least in one part: the build system. I just cloned the

Re: Unable to build uClibc with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64

2013-01-08 Thread mail-an-mw123
Hi uClibc Team, I'm working with uClibc and have problems compiling uCLibc with _FILE_OFFSET_BITS=64. I've ensured that LFS IS ACTIVATED in .config file but _FILE_OFFSET_BITS ist hard undefined in file include/features.h:445-446. Despite of activated LFS _FILE_OFFSET_BITS is not defined during

Re: Next release of uclibc

2013-01-08 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 6 January 2013 16:10:41 Anthony G. Basile bas...@opensource.dyc.edu wrote: Hi everyone, Is there a schedule for the next release of uclibc. I hit an issue with glib, traced it back to eventfd and noticed that a fix was already in the repo, but not in the latest release: I plan to roll a

Re: [ANNOUNCE] uClibc++-0.2.4 released

2013-01-08 Thread Yann E. MORIN
Bernhard, All, On Tuesday 08 January 2013 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: I have now pushed a slightliy refurbished buildsys for uClibc++ that works much better for me (no spurious rebuilds if nothing was changed, proper dependency tracking). Would be great if you folks could check if i broke