It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded. (NODELETE flag is set, or it is pulled
in via both NEEDED dependency and explicit dlopen()).
In these cases we must not re-add the DSO to the global symbol
scope as it is already there. Or we end up corrupting
On 27/06/2013 8.34, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded. (NODELETE flag is set, or it is pulled
in via both NEEDED dependency and explicit dlopen()).
In these cases we must not re-add the DSO to the global symbol
scope as
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded. (NODELETE flag is set, or it is pulled
in via both NEEDED dependency and explicit dlopen()).
Wouldn't it be more logical to prevent this from
On 27 June 2013 20:16:26 Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded. (NODELETE flag is set, or it is pulled
in via both NEEDED dependency and explicit
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:16:26 -0400
Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded. (NODELETE flag is set, or it is pulled
in via both NEEDED dependency
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:36:14 +0300
Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:16:26 -0400
Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:36:14PM +0300, Timo Teras wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 14:16:26 -0400
Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was already loaded.
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:36:44 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2013 20:16:26 Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen under certain cases that the DSO had refcount 0,
but was
On 27 June 2013 21:07:38 Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:36:44 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2013 20:16:26 Rich Felker dal...@aerifal.cx wrote:
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 09:34:32AM +0300, Timo Teräs wrote:
It can happen
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 21:25:12 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2013 21:07:38 Timo Teras timo.te...@iki.fi wrote:
On Thu, 27 Jun 2013 20:36:44 +0200
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer rep.dot@gmail.com wrote:
On 27 June 2013 20:16:26 Rich Felker
10 matches
Mail list logo