Does anybody have working pre-generated
locales for uClibc 0.9.30?
I tried to generate them by myself on a glibc
based system, but they are not generated
properly and cause build errors with excess
elements in array, etc.
Please, tell me.
This might be related to my post from March
Does anybody have working pre-generated
locales for uClibc 0.9.30?
I tried to generate them by myself on a glibc
based system, but they are not generated
properly and cause build errors with excess
elements in array, etc.
Please, tell me.
This might be related to my post from March
.
--
---
Ing. Jaromír Cápík
GSM : +420608817756, +420604322607
Jabber : tav...@jabber.cz
ICQ : 58381083
e-mail : tav...@email.cz, tav...@seznam.cz
___
uClibc mailing list
uClibc@uclibc.org
http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
packages failed since that as the busybox
stripped versions of tools often do not support switches
used in the build scripts, but I think I can hack such
cases. It looks much better now.
So, thanks for the hints.
Regards,
Jaromir.
--
---
Ing. Jaromír Cápík
Internet).
I would appreciate your help / hints / anything.
Thanks,
Jaromir.
--
---
Ing. Jaromír Cápík
GSM : +420608817756, +420604322607
Jabber : tav...@jabber.cz
ICQ : 58381083
e-mail : tav...@email.cz, tav...@seznam.cz
On 29 May 2015 at 13:11, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
Hello.
I'm trying to port my uClibc based distro to m68k and experience
SIGSEGV in __uClibc_main even when linking binaries statically.
I tried to crosscompile the m68k toolchain on i386 (uClibc based)
and m68k (glibc based
On 29 May 2015 at 17:54, Jaromír Cápík tav...@seznam.cz wrote:
You mentioned a distro you boottrapped a couple of weeks
ago. Do you have a working rootfs environment I could
test?
I did not submit the m68k patch to OE yet since i meant to get gmp
going first, no.
I found a complete
