Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-25 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Il 24 luglio 2014 23:05:34 Khem Raj ha scritto: On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> >> >> Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto: >> >> >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-24 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> >> >> Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto: >> >> >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my >> >support to Thomas' positi

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-24 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 09:20:51PM +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > > > Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto: > > >On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my > >support to Thomas' position. > > > Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-23 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Il 23 luglio 2014 13:42:38 Jody Bruchon ha scritto: On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my support to Thomas' position. > Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community > supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good thing. > Time has

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-23 Thread Jody Bruchon
On 7/22/2014 11:30 PM, Steve Bennett wrote:> I would like to add my support to Thomas' position. > Regardless of what happens with glibc and/or musl, an active community > supporting regular releases of uClibc is a good thing. > Time has spoken that we can't expect this to happen unless something

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-22 Thread Steve Bennett
On 22 Jul 2014, at 5:27 am, Thomas Petazzoni wrote: > Dear Florian Fainelli, > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:55:21 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >>> On my side, I fully support Waldemar's fork. The last uClibc release is >>> more than 2 years old, and Bernhard has never been answering to *any* >

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-21 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Florian Fainelli, On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:55:21 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > > On my side, I fully support Waldemar's fork. The last uClibc release is > > more than 2 years old, and Bernhard has never been answering to *any* > > of the e-mails asking to do a release, sent since September

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-21 Thread Florian Fainelli
2014-07-21 11:42 GMT-07:00 Thomas Petazzoni : > Dear Florian Fainelli, > > On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:23:46 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > >> 2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb : >> > Hello Embedded Linux Hackers, >> > >> > it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version. >> > The

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-21 Thread Thomas Petazzoni
Dear Florian Fainelli, On Mon, 21 Jul 2014 11:23:46 -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote: > 2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb : > > Hello Embedded Linux Hackers, > > > > it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version. > > The current maintainer does not response on any public or pr

Re: [OpenWrt-Devel] uClibc-ng

2014-07-21 Thread Florian Fainelli
Hello, (adding uclibc and Bernhard) 2014-07-20 12:13 GMT-07:00 Waldemar Brodkorb : > Hello Embedded Linux Hackers, > > it seems there is no plan to release a new uClibc version. > The current maintainer does not response on any public or private mails > about a plan to do a needed release. Theref