On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
With the current implementation, the invocation of dladdr((void *) 1,
dlinfo)
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Fri, Feb 08, 2008 at 10:24:40AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
With the current implementation, the invocation of
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
With the current implementation, the invocation of dladdr((void *) 1,
dlinfo)
will fill dlinfo.dli_fname with the name of the application itself and
dlinfo.dli_fbase
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
With the current implementation, the invocation of dladdr((void *) 1,
dlinfo)
will fill dlinfo.dli_fname with the name of the application itself and
dlinfo.dli_fbase
Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
With the current implementation, the invocation of dladdr((void *) 1,
dlinfo)
will fill dlinfo.dli_fname with the name of the application
Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
Från: Kevin Day [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Skickat: den 19 januari 2008 02:41
Till: Joakim Tjernlund
Kopia: Carmelo AMOROSO; uclibc@uclibc.org; Nickolai Zeldovich
Ämne: Re: [PATCH] Fix dladdr return value when cannot find symbol
On Jan 18, 2008 2:48 AM, Joakim Tjernlund [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 2008-01-18 at 09:08 +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hello,
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Hello,
based on the patch from Nickolai, here you can find a comprehensive
patch to fix
dladdr function.
Sorry, I missed a fix into dl-hash.c too. Find the missing change into
the attached patch.
Carmelo
Index: ldso/ldso/dl-hash.c
On Wednesday 12 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
while running more tests on this (indeed never used dladdr in the past),
which tests ? our dl tests certainly dont have the coverage anywhere close to
what i wish they did ...
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed
Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 11:26 AM, Carmelo Amoroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached patch tries to fix it. The GNU_HASH part needs to be fixed
accordingly.
Any comments ?
I think that should work. Minor point:
Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
On Dec 9, 2007 11:26 AM, Carmelo Amoroso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Attached patch tries to fix it. The GNU_HASH part needs to be fixed
accordingly.
Any comments ?
I think that should work. Minor point:
--- ldso/libdl/libdl.c (revision 20633)
+++
Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
The attached patch makes dladdr() return 0 when it cannot find a
matching symbol. The current behavior of returning 1 makes it
impossible for callers to know whether the supplied Dl_info buffer has
been filled in with meaningful data.
Nickolai.
Hi Nickolai,
I
Nickolai Zeldovich wrote:
The attached patch makes dladdr() return 0 when it cannot find a
matching symbol. The current behavior of returning 1 makes it
impossible for callers to know whether the supplied Dl_info buffer has
been filled in with meaningful data.
Nickolai.
I'll have a
The attached patch makes dladdr() return 0 when it cannot find a matching
symbol. The current behavior of returning 1 makes it impossible for callers
to know whether the supplied Dl_info buffer has been filled in with
meaningful data.
Nickolai.
uclibc-dladdr-return.patch
Description: Binary
14 matches
Mail list logo