On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 22:50 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:14:30 Mark Salter wrote:
A few places in the code check for existence of vfork by testing if
__NR_vfork is defined. Newer kernels don't have a vfork syscall in
which case, the library implements the vfork
On Thursday 26 April 2012 23:08:36 Rich Felker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:50:57PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This patch adds a test for __UCLIBC_VFORK_USES_CLONE__ feature
definition which an architecture may define if vfork is implemented
using clone.
err, if your kernel
On Friday 27 April 2012 01:07:42 Rich Felker wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2012 at 12:58:33AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Thursday 26 April 2012 23:08:36 Rich Felker wrote:
On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:50:57PM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote:
This patch adds a test for
On Thursday 26 April 2012 10:14:30 Mark Salter wrote:
A few places in the code check for existence of vfork by testing if
__NR_vfork is defined. Newer kernels don't have a vfork syscall in
which case, the library implements the vfork function using __NR_clone.
This patch adds a test for
