Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-05 Thread Mike Frysinger
i've started a page: http://uclibc.org/specs.html and pushed out the files: http://uclibc.org/docs/ hopefully people find these useful :) -mike signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ uClibc mailing list

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-05 Thread Sedat Dilek
On Sat, May 5, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: i've started a page:        http://uclibc.org/specs.html and pushed out the files:        http://uclibc.org/docs/ hopefully people find these useful :) Thanks for providing these docs! Unfortunately, many OSS project

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-04 Thread Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
On 4 May 2012 08:45, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: On Friday 04 May 2012 02:00:05 Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: We could stick them in the website repo. What do you think? add a new Specs link under Documentation ?  and have the uclibc/docs/ subdir have a small text file pointing

restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Mike Frysinger
after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated anywhere. any suggestions on where to restore these ? i'm not sure we can exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main repo. maybe start a new toplevel git repo and add it to uClibc.git as

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 7:02 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: after moving from svn to git, the docs/ subdir of trunk/ wasn't migrated anywhere.  any suggestions on where to restore these ?  i'm not sure we can exclude subdirs when using `git archive`, so we can't add them to the main

Re: restoring spec docs

2012-05-03 Thread Khem Raj
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:12 PM, Mike Frysinger vap...@gentoo.org wrote: my concern isn't history, it's the 11MB footprint (7.5 when compressed in a tarball) mostly due to the pdfs.  we don't want to include that in the release tarball when that's only 2.7MB right now. yes it occured to me