Re: [PATCH-NPTL] environ heeds to be a weak_alias

Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Hi Steve, > this patch to fix a problem into nptl branch related to strong_alias > used for data. Any code linked with the uCLibc-nptl trying to dereference > the 'environ' variable will segfault. > This has been already solved in trunk, and there are a lot of posts > into

Porting uclibc

Hi First, sorry for my bad english. French is my natural language I have a bare target with a Motorola colfire cpu. I want to know is it possible to modify some files like write.c and cross compil the uclibc package for m68k in order to port C library function like printf. Wath is the general

[PATCH-NPTL] environ heeds to be a weak_alias

Hi Steve, this patch to fix a problem into nptl branch related to strong_alias used for data. Any code linked with the uCLibc-nptl trying to dereference the 'environ' variable will segfault. This has been already solved in trunk, and there are a lot of posts into libc-alpha related to the wrong us

Re: [PATCH] sh4: use optimized asm version of memcpy - add config option to support backward copying

Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > Paul Mundt wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 09:18:33AM -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: >> >>> On Wednesday 21 March 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: >>> I'm currently using on uClibc-nptl for sh4 an optimized version of the memcpy function (from Stuart Menefy @STM

Re: [PATCH NPTL] fix tst-mqueue1.c testcase producing and hang

Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Carmelo Amoroso wrote: >> Hi Steve, All >> running test suite for our uClibc-nptl/sh4 we found a bug into >> tst-mqueue1.c test (this has been already fixed in glibc-cvs). >> This patch solve the bug and sync the test with glibc version. >> >> Regards, >> Carmelo >> > Sorry

Re: NPTL plans?

Steven J. Hill wrote: > On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:23:58AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: >> uhh, I thought that using current trunk was the way to go? >> > Correct. If there are no objections, I will proceed with placing > NPTL code into trunk. > > -Steve > Hi Steve, probably samething is change

Re: NPTL plans?

On Mon, May 28, 2007 at 11:23:58AM +0200, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: > > uhh, I thought that using current trunk was the way to go? > Correct. If there are no objections, I will proceed with placing NPTL code into trunk. -Steve ___ uClibc mailing list uCl

Re: NPTL plans?

On Mon, 2007-05-28 at 09:54 +0200, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: > Tjernlund wrote: > > What happened to the NPTL plans? I don't see any activity in this area. > > If this drags on, I think you will start to see other changes going into > > uClibc that may conflict with NPTL. > > > > Jocke > > > >

Re: NPTL plans?

Tjernlund wrote: > What happened to the NPTL plans? I don't see any activity in this area. > If this drags on, I think you will start to see other changes going into > uClibc that may conflict with NPTL. > > Jocke > > ___ > uClibc mailing list > uClibc