Re: futexes, PI and uclibc

2007-08-31 Thread Rob Landley
On Friday 31 August 2007 2:08:31 am Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > > At this point, it might be easier to just overwrite the current svn tree > > with the contents of the NPTL branch. The reason they havent' done it > > yet is they're not quite sure what regressions that might introduce > > (somebody ha

Stack Base Address on ARM9, using uclibc 0.9.28

2007-08-31 Thread Guenter Obiltschnig
Hi there, is there any way to find out the stack base address for the current thread on an ARM9 platform, using uclibc 0.9.28? We're currently porting some code to a uclibc based system, and part of that code does something like: pthread_getattr_np(currentThread, &attr); pthread_attr_getstac

Re: futexes, PI and uclibc

2007-08-31 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Rob Landley wrote: > On Thursday 30 August 2007 1:37:05 am Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: > >> Nitin Gupta wrote: >> On Monday 27 August 2007 5:01:13 pm Steven Rostedt wrote: > Hi all, > > I'm writing a chapter in the upcoming revision of Building Embedded > Linux