On Tuesday 06 November 2007, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
stopped by mailman since it attached more than 40 kB.
side note: ive upped the ante to 100 kB.
-mike
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
uClibc mailing
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:35:29 +0100
Hans-Christian Egtvedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK Haavard Skinnemoen (AVR32 Linux arch maintainer) is also
reading this list, and we have both done internal reviewing before
sending. He is on vacation at the moment, but I
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 07:35:29 +0100
Hans-Christian Egtvedt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
AFAIK Haavard Skinnemoen (AVR32 Linux arch maintainer) is also
reading this list, and we have both done internal reviewing before
sending. He is on vacation at the moment, but I can ask him to give
an ACK on
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or commits
of the 7 patches?
cut
Any feedback are very
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or commits
of the 7 patches?
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in
uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105).
Is there any reason why there has been no comments, refusals or
Included are 7 patches which adds support for AVR32 architecture in uClibc.
The patches is generated against the latest snapshot (20071105). Sorry if the
patches contain a bit lacking information, but my previous patch was stopped
by mailman since it attached more than 40 kB.
The patch set adds
