Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2008-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4)

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2008-01-10 Thread Mike Frysinger
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-04 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-04 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Bernhard Fischer wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-04 Thread Bernhard Fischer
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Bernhard Fischer wrote: On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote: Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-03 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an idea... why not redefining

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-03 Thread Carmelo Amoroso
Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-03 Thread Khem Raj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following error: ../ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function '_dl_dprintf':

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-03 Thread Paul Mundt
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following error: ../ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-12-03 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Paul Mundt wrote: On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote: Carmelo Amoroso wrote: while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following error:

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-11-28 Thread Hans-Christian Egtvedt
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote: On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-11-26 Thread Hans-Christian Egtvedt
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote: On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-syscalls.h that is included at the top of ldso/include/dl-syscall.h. This will not affect any other architectures,

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-11-19 Thread Haavard Skinnemoen
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100 Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-syscalls.h that is included at the top of ldso/include/dl-syscall.h. This will not affect any other architectures, letting the compiler to do the

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-11-16 Thread Hans-Christian Egtvedt
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:01 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: Hi, Some versions of gcc consider inline merely a hint. AVR32 depends on the system calls actually being inlined, so AVR32 needs to use __always_inline instead of just inline. The attached patch changes this for the system

Re: [PATCH] Always inline system calls

2007-11-16 Thread Carmelo AMOROSO
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:01 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote: Hi, Some versions of gcc consider inline merely a hint. AVR32 depends on the system calls actually being inlined, so AVR32 needs to use __always_inline instead of just inline. The attached