On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always
inline' changes, doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4)
On Thursday 10 January 2008, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 04 December 2007, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'
changes,
doscovered suddenly that
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 01:31:13PM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Bernhard Fischer wrote:
On Tue, Dec 04, 2007 at 08:36:31AM +0100, Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100
Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea... why not redefining
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100
Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'
changes,
doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following error:
../ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function '_dl_dprintf':
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'
changes,
doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following error:
../ldso/ldso/dl-elf.c: In function
Paul Mundt wrote:
On Mon, Dec 03, 2007 at 10:33:39PM +0100, Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
Carmelo Amoroso wrote:
while doing some test for SH4 to measure size increase for 'always inline'
changes,
doscovered suddenly that gcc-4.1.1 (cross sh4) fails with the following
error:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:54 +0100, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
On Tue, 2007-11-27 at 08:31 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100
Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into
Haavard Skinnemoen wrote:
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100
Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into
ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-syscalls.h that is included
at the top of ldso/include/dl-syscall.h.
This will not affect any other architectures,
On Fri, 16 Nov 2007 16:44:09 +0100
Carmelo AMOROSO [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just an idea... why not redefining 'inline' into
ldso/ldso/avr32/dl-syscalls.h that is included
at the top of ldso/include/dl-syscall.h.
This will not affect any other architectures, letting
the compiler to do the
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:01 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hi,
Some versions of gcc consider inline merely a hint. AVR32 depends on the
system calls actually being inlined, so AVR32 needs to use
__always_inline instead of just inline. The attached patch changes this
for the system
Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
On Mon, 2007-10-29 at 17:01 +0100, Hans-Christian Egtvedt wrote:
Hi,
Some versions of gcc consider inline merely a hint. AVR32 depends on the
system calls actually being inlined, so AVR32 needs to use
__always_inline instead of just inline. The attached
15 matches
Mail list logo