Hi,
Did someone succeed to port the last GTK release to ARM9/Linux2.6 target
(DirectFB) ? Now GTK needs a lot of additionnal libraries and a big memory
space to run What is your experience on a 200MHz/64Mo RAM target ?
Regards,
Xavier
___
Hi all,
This is why I some months ago suggested to take the glue makefile
concept in use :)
The glue makefile concept is that in snapgear/user every package looks
like this
snapgear/[user|lib]/packagename
Makefile
This structure is owned by snapgear. The glue makefile is the
--
Daniele Ziglioli
Signal S.r.l.
___
uClinux-dev mailing list
uClinux-dev@uclinux.org
http://mailman.uclinux.org/mailman/listinfo/uclinux-dev
This message was resent by uclinux-dev@uclinux.org
To unsubscribe see:
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
+ brelse(bh);
A little fyi: brelse() is rather old-fashioned, and has a usually unneeded
test for non-null bh in it. In situations where we know that the pointer is
valid, let's please use put_bh().
That's what was in the old romfs. I
Butok Andrey-B00423 wrote:
Option 1:
The better way is to edit the
/uClinux-dist/vendors/Freescale/M5329EVB/Makefile
...
DEVICES = \
...
ttygserial,c,127,0
...
Ah, this is what I was looking for - the better way! As
Hi,
I am able to boot uclinux with dBUG from SDRAM (go 0x2) and now I
want to boot uclinux from Flash (2MB). There is any procedure on how to
do?
I prefer to keep dBUG, do I have to install coLilo? uclinux should be
compressed/decompressed? how?
Any help would be greatly appreciated, thank
El Jueves, 22 de Febrero de 2007 15:07, Calin Onofrei escribió:
Hi,
I am able to boot uclinux with dBUG from SDRAM (go 0x2) and now I
want to boot uclinux from Flash (2MB). There is any procedure on how to
do?
I prefer to keep dBUG, do I have to install coLilo? uclinux should be
Hi Doug,
Yes, you are correct, one of the main differences is the extra directory
level.
It looks simple but one actually gets alot from it, separating the snapgears
makefiles (or building framework to put a name for it) from whatever build
framework a package may have although most will have
Hi:
I have Spartan-2e board here which resembles to certain extent
Spartan-3e starter kit. There are differences however - SDRAM instead of
DDR, older Microblaze core, higher CPU clock, EMAC instead Etherlite,
etc... I've attached auto-config.h files, generated by Petalogix BSP for
both cases.
On Mittwoch, 21. Februar 2007, NZG wrote:
Personally I'll probably just force all cards to a 512 block size.
Any card that ignores this command and wants to use a different size
is just going to have to be declared unsupported to support this new
SD garbage.
You don't need to set a block
Hi John,
John Williams wrote:
Is there a (good :) ) reason why uClinux-dist/Makefile clean: target now
deletes the $(LINUX)/include/asm symlink?
This means that after a make clean you have to make oldconfig to get the
symlink back. Perhaps this should be in distclean rather than clean?
It
11 matches
Mail list logo
