[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

2009-01-16 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Geert, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: More review, testing, comments welcome... Where to from here? I'll pull from it and give it some m68k test builds. After that, you can move it to for-next. If everything's well, it can go to Linus. Sounds like a pla

[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

2009-01-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > >>More review, testing, comments welcome... > > >>Where to from here? > > > > > >I'll pull from it and give it some m68k test builds. > > >After that, you can move it to for-next. If everything's well, it can go to > > >Linus. > > > > Sounds like a plan

Re: [uClinux-dev] Problem with romfs

2009-01-16 Thread Stephane Lambert
Hi Jate Thanks for your answers. Indeed, the romfs.img is cat'ed to the linux image and it is copied at the end of the bss section during startup procedure. With GDB I have checked the memory and -rom1fs- is at the address of _ebss. This point is correct. Concerning the size of romfs, it is the

RE: [uClinux-dev] Problem with romfs

2009-01-16 Thread Jate Sujjavanich
The uclinux driver is reporting a size of 0x18141000 or 403,968,000. I have a feeling that your romfs is not that large, and the size is off because it's reading the wrong data. I don't remember exactly, but I think the size may be the at the start of the romfs image. The uclinux driver is expe

[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

2009-01-16 Thread Sam Ravnborg
> >> > >>More review, testing, comments welcome... > >>Where to from here? > > > >I'll pull from it and give it some m68k test builds. > >After that, you can move it to for-next. If everything's well, it can go to > >Linus. > > Sounds like a plan. > > > >Or should I amend and add my SoB and put

[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

2009-01-16 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Geert, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote: On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Greg Ungerer wrote: Sam Ravnborg wrote: From 5a8b9717a399679c4753e596ea864b02a1197025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Sam Ravnborg Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:23:08 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files Merge header

[uClinux-dev] Environment Variables und Busybox

2009-01-16 Thread Matthias Wieloch
Hello, I use uClinux on one of my controllers (lpc2468) and at the moment I try to move from dist-20051411 to dist-20070130. So far I had not much problems but somehow I can't enable the busybox's command history and tab completion. As within dist-2005 in menuconfig I enabled to use another she

[uClinux-dev] Re: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files

2009-01-16 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009, Greg Ungerer wrote: > Sam Ravnborg wrote: > > > From 5a8b9717a399679c4753e596ea864b02a1197025 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Sam Ravnborg > > Date: Sat, 13 Dec 2008 21:23:08 +0100 > > Subject: [PATCH] m68k,m68knommu: merge header files > > > > Merge header files for m68k

Re: [uClinux-dev] subversion folders in uClinux/dist/patches

2009-01-16 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Bernd, Bernd Büttner wrote: I'm so sorry but there are still some in the directories: user/clamav/shared user/clamav/.split In the meantime I created an awk-file that removes them, so don't worry. Maybe it is just the patch that doesn't remove them. The master tree (that I make the patch

Re: [uClinux-dev] subversion folders in uClinux/dist/patches

2009-01-16 Thread Bernd Büttner
Hi Greg, I'm so sorry but there are still some in the directories: user/clamav/shared user/clamav/.split In the meantime I created an awk-file that removes them, so don't worry. Many thanks anyway Bernd Greg Ungerer schrieb: Hi Bernd, Bernd Büttner wrote: sorry for the delay, had some other

Re: [uClinux-dev] Problem with romfs

2009-01-16 Thread Stephane Lambert
Hi, yes CONFIG_ROMFS_FS is enabled. I've tried to enabled CONFIG_MTD_BLOCK, and several things have been done: ... uclinux[mtd]: RAM probe address=0x11414 size=0x18141000 Creating 1 MTD partitions on "RAM": 0x-0x18141000 : "ROMfs" mtd: Giving out device

Re: [uClinux-dev] boa-0.94.14 for uclinux-dist

2009-01-16 Thread Michael Schnell
Is there any boa-0.94.14 already ported to uclinux-dist? I'm using it successfully with the uClinux-distr for the NIOS2. There is a small glitch: this distr does not provide the madvise system call, but does set HAVE_MADVISE. So we needed to do a small change in the boa sourcecode to prevent

[uClinux-dev] no symbol version from kernel-2.6.26

2009-01-16 Thread advan_xiang
hi, all I compiled madwifi for kerel-2.6.26, but when I insmod ath_pci.ko ,there're some "no symbol version xxx" error as below: . ath_pci: no symbol version for ieee80211_chan2mode ath_pci: Unknown symbol ieee80211_chan2mode ath_pci: no symbol version for ieee80211_getrssi ath_pci: Unknow