Re: [uClinux-dev] Controlling GPIO on coldfire

2009-11-20 Thread Dan Snyder
> Hi Valentin, > > Valentin Favreau wrote: > > I'm new on uClinux/coldifre and I have a problem with the GPIO. > > > > I found, on the Internet, that I just need to set up a pointer to the > > I/O address to access to the I/O but when I run my application on > > uClinux the error message "Memory

Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support

2009-11-20 Thread Jamie Lokier
ucli...@browserseal.com wrote: > Please note that people new to uClinux are most likely to use > Codesourcery toolchain, rather than 2007 one from uClinux web site. Fwiw, on the ARM linux lists, Codesourcery is usually the recommended toolchain, not the 2007 uClinux toolchain or any of the many ot

[uClinux-dev] uclinux on SourceForge Reminder and Thanks!

2009-11-20 Thread Jim Donelson
So, far this year, there have been 3T Bytes of uclinux code downloaded from sourceforge. If you want your download to be 10-100 times faster, please continue to use this. Greg now puts all the patches up there right away, so you won't be missing anything. https://sourceforge.net/projects/uclinux/

Re: [uClinux-dev] uClinux and Skyeye

2009-11-20 Thread Jim Donelson
Riight now the 20090618 (no patches) does not seem to run with skyeye when built for skyeye. I am using the latest RC1 build of Skyeye: Here is the conf: #skyeye config file sample cpu: arm7tdmi mach: at91 mem_bank: map=M, type=RW, addr=0x, size=0x4000 mem_bank: map=M, type=RW, addr=

Re: [uClinux-dev] uClinux and Skyeye

2009-11-20 Thread uclinux
On 11/18/2009, "ucli...@browserseal.com" wrote: >Here we go again :) After I managed to compile uClinux for ARM GDB/Skyeye >target (with lots of sweat, tears and bugfixes) I tried to... you >guessed it, run it using Skyeye. Needless to say - it did not work. > >There are (so far) two problems: >1

Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM support

2009-11-20 Thread uclinux
On 11/18/2009, "Greg Ungerer" wrote: >ucli...@browserseal.com wrote: >> I'm trying to compile the latest version of uClinux on ARM and the >> multitude of errors that I'm getting leads me to believe that this >> architecture simply is not supported anymore, hence the first question - >> what happ

Re: [uClinux-dev] ARM compilation woes summary (and solution)

2009-11-20 Thread uclinux
On 11/18/2009, "Greg Ungerer" wrote: >Hi, > >ucli...@browserseal.com wrote: >> So, this is what it takes to compile the latest version 20090618 of >> uClinux with ARM, >> >> 1. Change libc from glibc to uClibc (compilation with glibc will fail >> during the patching phase) >> 2. Change uClibc con