Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-25 Thread Sven Johnsson
> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow To: uClinux development list Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed include/asm-m68knommu/mcfcache.h A detailed description of the cache control register can be found in the 5329 r

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-20 Thread Robin Getz
On Thu 19 Apr 2007 16:45, Greg Ungerer pondered: > I haven't run the dhrystone code for a while, so I don't have > any specific numbers. OK - no problem. > When I last looked at this the big difference seemed to be that > hardware vendors (well, Freescale in my example case) where using > the fas

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-19 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Robin, Robin Getz wrote: On Wed 18 Apr 2007 02:03, Greg Ungerer pondered: Sven Johnsson wrote: I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch to confirm it). The datasheet of the processor says 211

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-19 Thread NZG
Has anyone done the bf536 yet to see how it compares to the 537? thx, NZG On Thursday 19 April 2007 2:27 pm, Robin Getz wrote: > On Wed 18 Apr 2007 02:03, Greg Ungerer pondered: > > Sven Johnsson wrote: > > > I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get > > > an extremel

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-19 Thread Robin Getz
On Wed 18 Apr 2007 02:03, Greg Ungerer pondered: > Sven Johnsson wrote: > > I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get > > an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch > > to confirm it). The datasheet of the processor says 211 DMIPS! > > It looks

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-17 Thread Greg Ungerer
arch/m68knommu/platform/5307/start.S It looks ok in the 2.6.20 code base, but you need to check it in your older code base. Regards Greg From: Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow To: uClinux development list Hi Sven, Sven Johnsson

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-16 Thread Daniele Ziglioli
gerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow To: uClinux development list Hi Sven, Sven Johnsson wrote: > I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get > an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch >

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-16 Thread Daniele Ziglioli
gerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow To: uClinux development list Hi Sven, Sven Johnsson wrote: > I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get > an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch >

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-16 Thread Michael Broughton
include/asm-m68knommu/mcfcache.h A detailed description of the cache control register can be found in the 5329 reference manual. Mike Sven Johnsson wrote: I have browsed the Kernel configuration utility without finding the cache enable option. Where can I find it? Thanks for answering my

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-16 Thread Sven Johnsson
Subject: Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow To: uClinux development list Hi Sven, Sven Johnsson wrote: > I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get > an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch > to confirm it). The datash

RE: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-15 Thread Leonid
Subject: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow Hello, I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch to confirm it). The datasheet of the processor says 211 DMIPS! It seems like user space applications

Re: [uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-14 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Sven, Sven Johnsson wrote: I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch to confirm it). The datasheet of the processor says 211 DMIPS! It seems like user space applications don't get scheduled as

[uClinux-dev] Applications run too slow

2007-04-14 Thread Sven Johnsson
Hello, I have executed a Dhrystone 2.1 benchmark on my uClinux system and get an extremely low result, about 0.0259 DMIPS (I also used a stopwatch to confirm it). The datasheet of the processor says 211 DMIPS! It seems like user space applications don't get scheduled as much as they could have b