Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: [Asterisk] File not processed

2011-02-10 Thread Ithamar R. Adema
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 11:47 +0100, Gilles Ganault wrote: > Unfortunately, I checked how the uClinux kernel was configured for > compiling, and the inotify is indeed selected by default :-/ There was a bug with YAFFS2 not updating the timestamp on parent directories, which made Asterisk fail to pic

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: [Asterisk] File not processed

2011-02-08 Thread Ithamar R. Adema
On Wed, 2011-02-09 at 00:00 +0100, Gilles Ganault wrote: > I didn't about about inotify. I'll read up and see if maybe the > uClinux/Asterisk this appliance uses or the yaffs filesystem it uses > as root filesystem could be the reason for this behavior. If you're using yaffs as filesystem, check t

RE: [uClinux-dev] Re: [Asterisk] File not processed

2011-02-08 Thread Gavin Lambert
Quoth Gilles Ganault: > Thanks Ulisses. I'm not much of a developer so don't have enough > technical knowledge to tell, but others documents also say that > Asterisk checks a specific directory several times per second, hence > the need to use mv instead of cp, since mv is atomic. This is true reg