[uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch

2010-12-29 Thread Geert Uytterhoeven
On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 19:06, Baruch Siach bar...@tkos.co.il wrote: Hi Angelo, On Wed, Dec 29, 2010 at 02:13:22PM +0100, Angelo Dureghello wrote: just FYI, i tested kernel 2.6.36.2, unfortunately the issue is still there, below the call stack trace. Help from the m68k experts seems to be

[uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch

2010-12-29 Thread Angelo Dureghello
Hi all, thanks for the help, the kernel is a main line kernel. Then yes, i am still using uclinux tree for libc/tools. I collected another spinlock recursion with a slightly different call stack trace, as always, the spinlock recursion issue happen on a high tx/rx traffic of the dm9000e, in

Re: [uClinux-dev] Re: dm9000 patch

2010-12-29 Thread Greg Ungerer
Hi Angelo, On 30/12/10 06:57, Angelo Dureghello wrote: Hi all, thanks for the help, the kernel is a main line kernel. Then yes, i am still using uclinux tree for libc/tools. How is the DM9000 hardware connected to the 5307? I am wondering how you connected the interrupt (and to which