Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
On Monday 06 July 2009 00:24:46 David McCullough wrote:
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
On Wednesday 20 February 2008 19:22:38 David McCullough wrote:
If someone wants to have a go at reducing the code size/complexity a
bit (or not) and
Quoth Mike Frysinger:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
static void fatal (const char *, ...); static void fatal_perror
(const char *, ...);
are there really no libiberty funcs that do this ?
looks like the
On Thursday 13 March 2008, Gavin Lambert wrote:
Quoth Mike Frysinger:
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
static void fatal (const char *, ...); static void fatal_perror
(const char *, ...);
are there really
On Wednesday 20 February 2008, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
static void fatal (const char *, ...);
static void fatal_perror (const char *, ...);
are there really no libiberty funcs that do this ?
looks like the binutils peeps are lazy and just
On Tuesday 12 September 2006, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
static void fatal (const char *, ...);
static void fatal_perror (const char *, ...);
are there really no libiberty funcs that do this ?
static void append_option (options_t *, const char *);
static void append_options (options_t *, const
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
On Tuesday 12 September 2006, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
static void fatal (const char *, ...);
static void fatal_perror (const char *, ...);
are there really no libiberty funcs that do this ?
static void append_option (options_t *, const char *);
On Friday 29 December 2006, Mike Frysinger wrote:
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 18:46, David McCullough wrote:
Jivin Mike Frysinger lays it down ...
On Tuesday 12 September 2006 12:27, Nathan Sidwell wrote:
I posted this patch and pinged it a few times, but to no avail. Is
no one
