UdmSearch: mnogo what does it mean?

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
it's been bugging me for sometime now.. what does mnogo stand for? or what does it mean? __ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ __ If you want to unsubscribe send

Re: UdmSearch: mnogo what does it mean?

2001-01-30 Thread Sergey Kartashoff
Hi! Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 11:47:53 AM, you wrote: CTW it's been bugging me for sometime now.. what does mnogo stand for? or what does CTW it mean? In russian it means 'many', 'a lot of' -- Regards, Sergey aka gluke. __ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe

UdmSearch: Webboard: Using mnoGoSearch without database

2001-01-30 Thread Miroslav Keretic
Author: Miroslav Keretic Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Is it poissible to use mnoGoSearch WITHOUT database. Or is there nay other way to use mnoGoSearch in following situation: I have an ISP provider wich only allows me to put files via FTP on it's server and run scripts from it. It allows

UdmSearch: Webboard: Using mnoGoSearch without database

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Is it poissible to use mnoGoSearch WITHOUT database. Or is there nay other way to use mnoGoSearch in following situation: I have an ISP provider wich only allows me to put files via FTP on it's server and run scripts from it. It

UdmSearch: Webboard: Indexer not insering documents

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: The problem is stopwords and ispell db. If active one of this items: IspellUsePrefixes yes Ispellmode db and StopwordTable stopword indexer non inserts in dict* tables Alberto Thanks for the report. We'll fix it.

UdmSearch: Documentation

2001-01-30 Thread Dmitry Tkachenko
Dear all! I understand that some of you have troubles with mnoGoSearch documentation. I am the one responsible for its clarity and completeness. I really need your cooperation to provide clear documentation and would be gratefull if you send me any relevant information regarding this issue.

Re: UdmSearch: splitter still core dumps on 3.1.9

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
that was a little premature on my part. it did core dump again at 77C when i tried to split another log file. argh. --- Caffeinate The World [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: overnight, the "new splitter" using "u_int32_t" was able to split a log file around 31MB. this is the first time i've seen it

Re: UdmSearch: splitter still core dumps on 3.1.9

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Caffeinate The World wrote: overnight, the "new splitter" using "u_int32_t" was able to split a log file around 31MB. this is the first time i've seen it able to index the log at 77C. can you verify that linux and such have "u_int32_t"? if it's does, i'll submit my patch. this should fix

UdmSearch: Webboard: indexer will not index Site

2001-01-30 Thread Werner Bruns
Author: Werner Bruns Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Hello there, regardless what I'm trying, the indexer is doing nothing. First I modified the indexer.conf (hopefully right), all what it did, it indexed the file "robots.txt" thats it. Second it used the minimal version of the indexer.conf.

Re: UdmSearch: splitter still core dumps on 3.1.9

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
another interesting thing to note is that, from using the old log files created by the "old" cachelogd (size_t instead of unsigned int), if "splitter" core dumped, and i remove the file which caused it, i.e. rm /usr/local/install/mnogosearch-3.1.9/var/tree/77/C/77C3 and redo "splitter -f

Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: indexer will not index Site

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
how about showing us what your configuration look like, and how you are running indexer (with what parameters etc) --- Werner Bruns [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: Werner Bruns Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Hello there, regardless what I'm trying, the indexer is doing nothing. First I

Possible Fix? (Re: UdmSearch: DeleteNoServer still broken in 3.1.9)

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
alex or serge, could you look over this patch? i believe this patch should fix this problem described below: ---cut--- # diff -ru indexer.c.orig indexer.c --- indexer.c.orig Tue Jan 30 10:45:03 2001 +++ indexer.c Tue Jan 30 10:47:29 2001 @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ } /* Find

Re: UdmSearch: Bug report

2001-01-30 Thread Sergey Kartashoff
Hi! Tuesday, January 30, 2001, 8:53:12 AM, you wrote: LBQuery error: SELECT SQL_SMALL_RESULT url.url, url.title, url.txt, url.content_type, LB url.docsize, url.last_mod_time, url.keywords, url.description, url.crc32, LB url.rec_id

UdmSearch: 3.1.9 indexer bug with msql 2.0.11

2001-01-30 Thread
indexer -a cause following error: Indexer[63411]: [1] Error: 'syntax error at line 1 near "where 1"' I look in sources and find that msql 2.0.11 dislike 'WHERE 1=1' construction in the places like (sql.c): SELECT status,next_index_time FROM url WHERE 1=1 When I remove "WHERE 1=1"

UdmSearch: Webboard: Crash! Tainted prefix dirs

2001-01-30 Thread Mario Gray
Author: Mario Gray Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Mnogo 3.1.9 still crashes very often, anyone have this experience as well? Reply: http://search.mnogo.ru/board/message.php?id=1195 __ If you want to unsubscribe send "unsubscribe udmsearch" to [EMAIL PROTECTED]

UdmSearch: Webboard: How to index meta customizedtag=...

2001-01-30 Thread Chen Zhang
Author: Chen Zhang Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: According to the udmsearch documentation, the indexer could grab contents in title, meta description, meta keyword, body , url , url path ... But I have thouthands of files with the keywords in the format as meta specialword=" 'name|chen'

Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: Crash! Tainted prefix dirs

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
what in particular crashes? what mode do you use? etc? --- Mario Gray [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: Mario Gray Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: Mnogo 3.1.9 still crashes very often, anyone have this experience as well? Reply: http://search.mnogo.ru/board/message.php?id=1195

Re: UdmSearch: Webboard: How to index meta customizedtag=...

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
--- Chen Zhang [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Author: Chen Zhang Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: According to the udmsearch documentation, the indexer could grab contents in title, meta description, meta keyword, body , url , url path ... But I have thouthands of files with the keywords in

UdmSearch: 3.1.9 contribution: missing create/msql/{ispell.txt,track.txt}

2001-01-30 Thread Andrey A. Chernov
I found those DB init files missing in msql (but present in mysql), here is their msql versions attached. -- Andrey A. Chernov http://ache.pp.ru/ msql_init.tgz

Re: UdmSearch: 3.1.9 indexer bug with msql 2.0.11

2001-01-30 Thread
On Tue, Jan 30, 2001 at 21:59:44 +0300, áÎÄÒÅÊ þÅÒÎÏ× wrote: Try to change 1=1 to rec_id0 Yes, it works, thanx! Here is simple patch for all 1=1 places. In case _all_ databases can understand rec_id0 instead of 1=1 (I don't know), it can be even simpler. --- src/sql.c.bak Wed Jan

Re: Possible Fix? (Re: UdmSearch: DeleteNoServer still broken in 3.1.9)

2001-01-30 Thread Caffeinate The World
oops that didn't work. but i'm pretty sure we need to test for the condition of delete_no_server here. i also tried: /* Find correspondent Server record from indexer.conf */ if(!(CurSrv=UdmFindServer(Indexer-Conf,Doc-url,aliastr))){ if(Indexer-Conf-csrv-delete_no_server){

Re: UdmSearch: 3.1.9 indexer bug with msql 2.0.11

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Try to change 1=1 to rec_id0 Yes, it works, thanx! BTW, is it will be correct to add "ORDER BY status" for msql? (from http://www.hughes.com.au/library/msql/manual_20/spec.html) I see you use similar "GROUP BY status" for other databases, but not for msql. mSQL does not support

UdmSearch: Webboard: Disallow Directory Listings

2001-01-30 Thread Juan
Author: Juan Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: I have tried to use all the examples available, and read the docs. I searched the forum, but still can't keep directory listings out of the index. /$ \/% doesn't work. Does anyone have any idea how to keep indexer from indexing directory

Re: UdmSearch: DeleteNoServer still broken in 3.1.9

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
That's strange. I've tested your indexer.conf. Everything works fine. indexer does not delete this URL. Caffeinate The World wrote: i reported this back in 3.1.9pre13. i have 'DeleteNoServer no' set with many URL's in my sql db not having associated Server commands. here i just tried to

Re: Possible Fix? (Re: UdmSearch: DeleteNoServer still broken in 3.1.9)

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
This patch will not fix the problem. The problem is not here. "DeleteNoServer no" is implemented via adding one virtual emtpy server after loading indexer.conf. It means that if there is no other correspondent Server or Realm commands for some URL, indexer will find the last one empty server and

Re: UdmSearch: file: URL indexing bug in mnoGoSearch 3.1.9 / udmSearch 3.0.23

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Hi! Finally I've checked your patch. Now indexer works as expected. Thanks you very much! Kaspar Brand wrote: Hi, when experimenting with udmSearch/mnoGoSearch, I encountered the following bug when indexer processes file: URLs. While indexer correctly processes file names containing

UdmSearch: Webboard: Indexer not insering documents

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: The problem is stopwords and ispell db. If active one of this items: IspellUsePrefixes yes Ispellmode db and StopwordTable stopword indexer non inserts in dict* tables Alberto Hi! We checked. Everything seem to work

UdmSearch: Webboard: Disallow Directory Listings

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Author: Alexander Barkov Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Message: I have tried to use all the examples available, and read the docs. I searched the forum, but still can't keep directory listings out of the index. /$ \/% doesn't work. Does anyone have any idea how to keep indexer from indexing

Re: Possible Fix? (Re: UdmSearch: DeleteNoServer still broken in 3.1.9)

2001-01-30 Thread Alexander Barkov
Well, indexer.conf is loaded as expected. Now find this in UdmFindServer() : for(i=0;iConf-nservers;i++){ int res; regmatch_t subs[NS]; and insert here: printf("%d '%s'

Re: UdmSearch: 3.1.9 indexer bug with msql 2.0.11

2001-01-30 Thread
On Wed, Jan 31, 2001 at 10:12:54 +0400, Alexander Barkov wrote: BTW, is it will be correct to add "ORDER BY status" for msql? (from http://www.hughes.com.au/library/msql/manual_20/spec.html) I see you use similar "GROUP BY status" for other databases, but not for msql. mSQL does not