SV: ugnet_: 1962 unworkable arrangement!

[dbbwanika db]

Mw. Kasangwawo

Unfortunately I happen to agree to small entities call them districts or federal entities for matter or organisational and managerial reasons.
They are easy to monitor and run by us in Uganda.

However just a few months ago I forwarded a proposal in such one district in Buganda for the development of that districts towns – this is a personal effort exactly as we have done since 1996.

I met with the so-called engineer who actually happens to be the district town planner – I went through the entire plan and how the project was to be financed, executed and how the district was to benefit. Luckily the man had had some idea about what I was talking about and loved the idea so much.

That was the last time I saw the district town engineer planner despite a month of trial to get the man take up the proposal to a higher level for action and implementation!

Last time I read in the papers that he and others were being investigated by IGG for misappropriation of district funds. End.

FEDERO

As of the above I have heard and seen with my own eyes similar stories and things – how will federo solve these and other deeply rooted human pervasive behaviourism and I also what to know FEDEROs’ solution to such problems and how they will be solved?

bwanika.

----------------
Kipenji,

why don't you compare the two and find out for yourself?

The 1962 constitution (main excerpts) is at:

http://www.federo.com/Pages/Uganda_Constitution_1962.htm

while the federal proposal is at:

http://www.federo.com/Pages/FedsNet%20Federal%20Proposals.htm

Kasangwawo

__________
bwanika

url: www.idr.co.ug

Logon & Join in ug-academicsdb discussion list

http://www.coollist.com/subcribe.html

List ID: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Your Email address:
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

url: http://uhpl.uganda.co.ug
http://pub59.ezboard.com/fugandamanufacturersassociationfrm1