Blair seeks new powers to attack rogue states

By Andy McSmith and Jo Dillon

13 July 2003

Tony Blair is appealing to the heads of Western governments to agree a new
world order that would justify the war in Iraq even if Saddam Hussein's
elusive weapons of mass destruction are never found.
It would also give Western powers the authority to attack any other
sovereign country whose ruler is judged to be inflicting unnecessary
suffering on his own people.
A Downing Street document, circulated among foreign heads of state who are
in London for a summit, has provoked a fierce row between Mr Blair and the
German Chancellor, Gerhard Schröder.
Mr Schröder is in London for a summit of "progressive" governments, convened
by Mr Blair, which opens today.
Mr Blair has involved British troops in five conflicts overseas in his six
years in office, and appears to be willing to take part in many more.
The document echoes his well-known views on "rights and responsibilities" by
saying that even for self-governing nation states "the right to sovereignty
brings associated responsibilities to protect citizens".
This phrase is immediately followed by a paragraph which appears to give the
world's democracies carte blanche to send troops anywhere there is civil
unrest or a tyrant who refuses to mend his ways. It says: "Where a
population is suffering serious harm, as a result of internal war,
insurgency, repression or state failure, and the state in question is
unwilling or unable to halt or avert it, the principle of non-intervention
yields to the international responsibility to protect."
A political row with Mr Schröder will add to Mr Blair's difficulties at a
time when the American and British intelligence services have fallen out
with each other over the question of whether Saddam had been seeking to
construct a nuclear bomb.
In Washington, the US government has withdrawn the claim that Iraqi agents
were in Niger trying to buy uranium. The head of the CIA, George Tenet, has
accepted the blame for allowing this claim to be included in President
George Bush's State of the Nation speech, in which it was attributed to
British intelligence. The former foreign secretary Robin Cook has challenged
Mr Blair to publish any evidence Britain has to back up the uranium story.
He told The Independent on Sunday: "The longer they delay coming up with it,
the greater the suspicion will become that they don't really believe it
themselves.
"There is one simple question the Government must answer when the Commons
meets on Monday: why did their evidence not convince the CIA? If it was not
good enough to be in the President's address, it was not good enough to go
in the Prime Minister's dossier.
"A month ago I gave Tony Blair the opportunity to admit that in good faith
he had got it wrong when he warned of the uranium deal. Now that President
Bush has made just that admission it looks as if Tony Blair would have been
wise to get his in first."
But Jack Straw, the Foreign Secretary, insisted yesterday the information
did not come from British intelligence but from some other, unnamed country,
and that it was accurate.
In a letter to the chairman of the Commons foreign affairs committee, Donald
Anderson, Mr Straw said: "UK officials were confident that the dossier's
statement was based on reliable intelligence which we had not shared with
the US."
This public disagreement with the CIA, coupled with anger in Britain over
the fate of British suspects held at the US base at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba,
forms an awkward background for Mr Blair's visit to Washington on Thursday,
when he will meet President Bush.
Dr Hans Blix, the former head of the UN weapons inspection team in Iraq, has
told the IoS that he believes the British government "over-interpreted" the
available intelligence about Iraq's weapons.
Dr Blix was particularly scathing about the claim made in a British
government dossier, released last September, that Iraq had chemical and
biological weapons "deployable within 45 minutes".
"I think that was a fundamental mistake. I don't know how they calculated
this figure of 45 minutes. That seems pretty far off the mark to me," he
said.
The Liberal Democrat foreign affairs spokesman, Menzies Campbell, said: "Day
by day the case for an independent scrutiny of the lead-up to the war
against Iraq becomes irresistible. Only full disclosure can restore the
reputation of this Government."
The failure to find the weapons is damaging public trust in the Prime
Minister and his relations with the Labour Party, with many backbench MPs
who supported the decision to go to war now saying they might have changed
their minds if they had known that the weapons might never be found.
The former international development secretary Clare Short will urge the
Prime Minister in an interview broadcast on GMTV today to resign before
things get "nastier". This brought a strong rebuke yesterday from the Home
Secretary, David Blunkett. He said: "Clare Short is being typically
self-indulgent. It is important to get behind the Prime Minister and focus
on the things that matter to people, like decent opportunities and economic
prosperity. I do not understand why people would plot to try to change the
most successful leader in the Labour Party's history."
There was also support for the Prime Minister from his old ally, Bill
Clinton. At a London conference organised by Peter Mandelson and attended by
the Chilean President Ricardo Lagos, the Canadian Prime Minister Jean
Chrétien and hundreds of Labour Party supporters, the former US president
urged the left to stop attacking Mr Blair or risk the renaissance of
conservatism.
"If we want to prevail we will have to learn how to make our case better,"
he said. "We're living in a new world in which we will be swallowed whole if
we do not, and all the evidence of the good we have done will be lost if we
give in to inter-party squabbles on the left and lay down in the face of
attacks from the right."



Mitayo Potosi


_________________________________________________________________
Add photos to your e-mail with MSN 8. Get 2 months FREE*. http://join.msn.com/?page=features/featuredemail


Reply via email to