Friends
We as society decided to police ourselves, we pick the best from amongst us
and train them to patrol our streets as we sleep. They deter the drunkards
off streets, deranged from our homes, and drug addicts from our residences,
it is quite a tough job. Thus we pay them well, and we equip them well, but
we are very careful on how we charge them if they break the law in the
process of protecting us. In the summer of 2013 a man caused a brawl in a
Toronto street car, police was called in and a Constable pumped about 9
bullets in him. Those bullets were fired in three intervals of three and
three then three. Because only Toronto Police supervisors have Tasers, the
supervisor arrived when the man is already dead, he rushed into the street
car and tasered the already dead man, so that the medical examiner finds it.
We think the plan was to claim that the man fought with police, they tasered
him he kept on coming then they had to shoot him. What the officer and the
supervisor did not know was that the particular street car had a camera and
recorded everything. I bring this issue to illustrate how tough it is to
convict police officers. We love and defend our police officers and they are
among the best paid in the Western hemisphere, but we thumb them as soon as
we see a bad Apple. You have no clue how fast. This was a bad cop and a bad
supervisor, so he was arrested and charged.
Because Const. James Forcillo was a Police Officer we did not charge him for
the first three bullets he fired, we considered that a shooting done in the
process of doing his job, no matter how he made that decision. The second
phase that he fired when the kid is already down is what we charged him with
a second degree murder charge, but we accompanied it with an attempted
murder charge to the third phase of bullets. When the judicial wheel stopped
rolling he was found not guilty of second degree but he was found guilty of
attempted murder. James was sentenced to six years, five months and 29 days
after his appeal was rejected. This past January he was granted a full
parole with instructions to never contact the family of the man and to never
own a gun in his entire life.
The officer that allegedly murdered George Floyd has ben charged with murder
in the second degree, and many out there are exited for it is the best they
can get out of this anger. They wish he was charged with murder in the first
degree. Edward Pojim requested for a firing squad. Then I go back and
realize that United States laws in this kind of cases are actually written
by the states than the Federal Government. The state of Minnesota has been
ran by Democrats for about 50 years, during that time they have become the
Dr Kiiza Besigye that wrote the laws to decapitate UPC the very laws
decapitating him today. In Minnesota to charge some one of murder in the
second degree, you are stating that you know he committed the murder, but
you are alleging that he intended to do that act. So what you are proving is
not murder, but intent. That puts this case into a very tough position for
there is nothing ever tough to prove than intent, because that is to prove
what he was thinking. You either have to own a witness that talked to him a
day or two before, and he specifically told him that the is going to murder
that man, you need a witness he specifically told that one of those days I
am going to go after him and murder him. Or you need the officer to stand up
in court and agree that he woke up that morning with intention to track
Floyd and murder him. You need to show that he went both way side, stalked
Floyd for days until when he got a chance to kill him, it is intent you are
proving in this case.
With that back ground, I see the defense requesting for a moving of that
case out of the twin city for the city is too bias for a fair trial, there
is a secondary danger into that for outside the twin cities, Minnesota does
not have too many blacks, thus any smaller location it will be moved to you
are going to have a jury of mostly white people charging a white police
officer. And they are making a decision on a very serious charge based on
understanding what the officer was thinking. Anger is good and this
particular anger is very justified, but anger must never be used in deciding
what to charge a police officer. The higher case to choose to charge, the
tougher it becomes to prove in a court room.
As a critical thinker, I worry about that single high end charge. But again
I am not a lawyer let alone try to play one.
EM -> { Trump for 2020 }
On the 49th Parallel
Thé Mulindwas Communication Group
"With Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja and Dr. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda is in
anarchy"
Kuungana Mulindwa Mawasiliano Kikundi
"Pamoja na Yoweri Museveni, Ssabassajja na Dk. Kiiza Besigye, Uganda ni
katika machafuko"
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/
All Archives can be found at http://www.mail-archive.com/ugandanet@kym.net/
The above comments and data are owned by whoever posted them (including
attachments if any). The List's Host is not responsible for them in any way.
---------------------------------------
