Mr Kibuka,
 
He is the short answer to your question #1. from the horse's own mouth (my emphasis):
 

DEMOCRACY AND LIBERTY

He did not mind people saying it was a good thing to have Parliamentary democracy, or even a great thing. But he stressed there was no point in pretending that Uganda was at a stage where
full Parliamentary democracy could obtain, because there were certain matters that came with it that were lacking in Uganda
. These things had become effective in certain states in the world after many years of trial and error, and many upheavals. But they did not just come like that. Uganda must be prepared to go through years of trial and error in order to get them. Many countries of the world were in various transitional stages. It could not be achieved by wishful thinking.
DR. A. MILTON OBOTE (The President) Uganda Argus 23rd June,

see: www.kituochakatiba.co.ug/kafir.htm



Joseph Senyonjo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Mr. Kibuka,
 
You are right, Mwenda should have put those questions to AMO. It would seem from the 1966-1967 machinations ochestrated by Obote and his disciples that the answer to all the three questions is NO.
 
Joseph

"M. Kibuka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Jal Senyonjo,

I bet you can venture an answer to these questions that the likes of
Mwenda should have asked:

1. Does Jal Obote believe in multi-partyism, free and fair elections
ec.?
2. Does Jal Obote believe in presidential term limits?
3. Does Jal Obote subscribe to power sharing in the form of federo?

It is allowed to subsitute Jal Obote for UPC as there is a very
little difference if at all between the two.

Cheers, M. Kibuka
==============================
Federo is the only way forward
http://www.federo.com


--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Joseph Senyonjo
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mr.  Kibuka,

> Thanks for sharing this indispensable link containing Abu Mayanja's
brilliant analysis right at the time when Uganda was beg inning to
disintegrate

> http://www.federo.com/Pages/1967%20Constitution%20-%20Abu%
20Mayanja.htm


> There are a couple of choice sentences from the article which I
thought were worth highlighting for our purposes here:

> First:

> Unifomity may not be co-extensive with unity, and a constitution
which looks to the end-result, without carefully evaluating or
allowing for the strengths of exisiting tribal feeling, may not be
realistic or intelligent.

> Second:

> The present proposals, by making the President virtually
irremovable from office are an open invitation to revolution. Yet the
truest test for a successful constitution is whether it provides for
a change of government by constitutional means, without recourse to
revolution.

> Like you, I also noted the reference, by the Obote I government, to
Uganda's backwardness, and why it was not ready for democracy as
practiced elsewhere in the world. This has precisely been Museveni's
position for the past 20 years!

> It is gratifying to note that there were people such as Mayanja who
foresaw the turmoil that the 1967 'Republican' constitution would
bring Uganda.

> Joseph





____________________________________________________________________________________


Yahoo! Mail
Stay connected, organized, and protected. Take the tour

____________________________________________________________________________________



Yahoo! Groups Links


Yahoo! Mail Mobile
Take Yahoo! Mail with you! Check email on your mobile phone.
_______________________________________________
Ugandanet mailing list
Ugandanet@kym.net
http://kym.net/mailman/listinfo/ugandanet
% UGANDANET is generously hosted by INFOCOM http://www.infocom.co.ug/

Reply via email to