> I'm going thru the FAQs now, and there's one for how to scale out which
> talks about the CPM.
>
> What should be our phase-in / out plan for this, in Apache?
>
> -Marshall
>
If this is version 2.1, seems wise to leave it in for now. Why announce a
phase-out plan before an alternative is availab
I'm going thru the FAQs now, and there's one for how to scale out which
talks about the CPM.
What should be our phase-in / out plan for this, in Apache?
-Marshall
>Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them? I
>think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
>because:
>
>1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
>work is on Apache
>2) it signals that Apache UIMA is the release th
Semantic Search repackaging
---
Key: UIMA-15
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-15
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build, Packaging
Reporter: Marshall Schor
Do everything
Plugin manifests still list IBM as the vendor
-
Key: UIMA-14
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-14
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Components: Eclipse plugins
Report
Javadocs should be posted on the website
Key: UIMA-13
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-13
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Website
Reporter: Adam Lally
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-7?page=all ]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-7.
---
Resolution: Fixed
> Add javadocs to build
> -
>
> Key: UIMA-7
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-7
>
Right you are - I misunderstood what was being proposed. I agree that
splitting the JCas impl code into interface / impl would be a good idea
and wouldn't impact things too much.
-Marshall
Adam Lally (JIRA) wrote:
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=comments#action_1244944
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=comments#action_12449444 ]
Adam Lally commented on UIMA-10:
I'm not seeing why making JCas an interface would require users to change their
code. That would be the case if we changed the gener
Change JCas impl to use inner classes rather than _Type style classes
-
Key: UIMA-12
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-12
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=comments#action_12449437 ]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-10:
Doing this means users will no longer be able to use "new
UserDefinedType(aJcas)", but will instead have to do something like
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4?page=all ]
Marshall Schor updated UIMA-4:
--
Description:
Construct an appropriate shell script, and run it to check the eol-style and
keyword and mime-type for files in SVN.
For test files, check that eol-styl
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=all ]
Adam Lally updated UIMA-10:
---
Description: We should split the existing JCAS class into an interface
org.apache.uima.jcas.JCas and its implementation
org.apache.uima.jcas.impl.JCasImpl. This follows go
org.apache.itu package should be renamed
Key: UIMA-11
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-11
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core Java Framework
Repo
[
http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10?page=comments#action_12449418 ]
Thilo Goetz commented on UIMA-10:
-
Is that a typo, did you mean org.apache.uima.jcas.impl?
> Split JCas into interface and implementation
> -
Split JCas into interface and implementation
Key: UIMA-10
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-10
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core Java Framework
Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote:
Set svn:eol-style and other flags on appropriate files
--
Key: UIMA-4
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-9?page=all ]
Adam Lally updated UIMA-9:
--
Priority: Minor (was: Major)
> Remove support for xi:include
> -
>
> Key: UIMA-9
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/ji
Remove support for xi:include
-
Key: UIMA-9
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-9
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: Core Java Framework
Reporter: Adam Lally
Add javadocs to build
-
Key: UIMA-7
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-7
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build, Packaging
Reporter: Adam Lally
Assigned To: Adam Lally
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-8?page=all ]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-8:
-
Assignee: Adam Lally
> Add examples to assembly
>
>
> Key: UIMA-8
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIM
Add examples to assembly
Key: UIMA-8
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-8
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build, Packaging
Reporter: Adam Lally
The example source code,
Include documentation in assembly
-
Key: UIMA-6
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Build, Packaging
Reporter: Adam Lally
Our bui
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-6?page=all ]
Adam Lally reassigned UIMA-6:
-
Assignee: Adam Lally
> Include documentation in assembly
> -
>
> Key: UIMA-6
> URL: http://issues.apache.o
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5?page=all ]
Marshall Schor reassigned UIMA-5:
-
Assignee: Marshall Schor
> re-organize docbook project and update ant build scripts
>
>
>
re-organize docbook project and update ant build scripts
Key: UIMA-5
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Documentation
Set svn:eol-style and other flags on appropriate files
--
Key: UIMA-4
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-4
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Reporter: Marshall Schor
Split big book into 4, rewrite to be appropriate for Apache UIMA, redo in
DocBook, get it generate high-quality PDF
---
Key: UIMA-3
URL: http://issues.
Fix licensing issues with Eclipse plugins
-
Key: UIMA-2
URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-2
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Task
Components: Eclipse plugins
Reporter: Marsh
Marshall Schor wrote:
...
How about making .txt files that should be treated as test-case-input
have some distinguishing type extension?
That way, we could make use of subversion configuration settings, as
well as have shell scripts that we could
run occasionally to fix things, based on the ext
Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them? I
think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
because:
1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
work is on Apache
2) it signals that Apache UIMA is the release that
Thilo Goetz wrote:
We need to be careful and selective when setting this property. It's
ok for source code, but anything else, we need to check. For example,
we've had endless trouble with text files that we use as test case
input. If eol-style is set to native on those, test cases behave
d
Adam Lally wrote:
Now see, if we had just changed the name of the project then we could
have reset our version number to 1.0 without any problem. :) Now all
options seem flawed: If we call it 2.1, it seems strange to me that
2.x would be split with 2.0 being com.ibm and 2.1 being org.apache.
On
On 11/13/06, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our version is currently called 1.0-SNAPSHOT, which is the Maven
default. What are we going to call this version, anyway? We have 2.0
out already, and the move to Apache justifies a major version hike, to
my mind. 3.0, anyone? Or are we star
I did the SVN reorganization to move uima-website under site/trunk,
and I checked out the generated html files to people.apache.org. So
the new website (including my instructions on how to build UIMA)
should be live in a few hours.
If you have uima-website checked out, please delete it and check
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1?page=all ]
Adam Lally resolved UIMA-1.
---
Resolution: Fixed
Moved uima-website directory and deleted the obsolete site-publish directory.
SVN organization is now:
site/
trunk/
uima-website/
** xml sources
Marshall Schor wrote:
...
To do this, we need to always set
svn:eol-style native on all the files that might be checked out and edited.
We need to be careful and selective when setting this property. It's ok
for source code, but anything else, we need to check. For example,
we've had endles
Marshall Schor wrote:
There's a discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how to name releases
when using Maven, that includes the word "incubator" / "incubating".
Adam - if our releases aren't this way already, could you open an Jira
issue and fix?
-Marshall
Our version is currently called 1.
Marshall Schor wrote:
...
It seems to me to be a bad practice to put generated files into SVN,
...
One argument in favor or checking in the website is that in case of a
move or crash, it's very easy to restore the web site (even for someone
not at all associated with our project).
Another
39 matches
Mail list logo