Re: Getting ConceptMapper into the sandbox

Marshall Schor wrote: > Hi Michael, > > Thanks for pinging the list about this. > > It would help a lot if you could enter a Jira issue, and list the > current status and tasks that are still needed to be accomplished. > > Here are the tasks (If some of these are done already, that's great): >

Re: [DISCUSS] holding a vote on the Cas Viewer submission

Does the community wish to have more discussion about this before I call for the vote? I think there are still open questions which should be answered before a new vote. I would like to know if we merge with the Cas Editor, does this makes sense for us ? In my opinion this means technica

[DISCUSS] holding a vote on the Cas Viewer submission

It looks to me like we're having technical discussions about how to merge the Cas Viewer and Cas Editor functionality, and that it may be time to hold a vote on accepting, officially, the Cas Viewer donation into the sandbox. See http://markmail.org/message/pqzknpc6ywngtiam Does the community

Re: Getting ConceptMapper into the sandbox

Hi Michael, Thanks for pinging the list about this. It would help a lot if you could enter a Jira issue, and list the current status and tasks that are still needed to be accomplished. Here are the tasks (If some of these are done already, that's great): Do the IP Clearance Form for this (an

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1130) Deployment Descriptor should allow setting the number of concurrent listeners for a reply queue

Marshall Schor (JIRA) wrote: > are there use cases where the remote delegate would be able to get > requests from the remote broker, but possibly not be able to send it > replies? (e.g., due to firewall issues?) > >>>Yes, when the client is behind a firewall, but the remote delegate > [servi

[jira] Created: (UIMA-1137) Service hangs if deployed before broker is ready

Service hangs if deployed before broker is ready Key: UIMA-1137 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1137 Project: UIMA Issue Type: Bug Components: Async Scaleout Affe

Getting ConceptMapper into the sandbox

I am just following up on the status of getting ConceptMapper actually into the sandbox, as it was approved by vote and all paperwork from seems to be in order. What needs to be done next, and is there anything I can do to help?

Re: [jira] Created: (UIMA-1136) [DDE] Support editing of Prefetch value and set default value to 0 (instead of 1)

If we agree that the default value of the "prefetch" is 0 (instead of 1), we may need to modify the documentation as well. Should I create a new JIRA so that we don't forget ? - Tong On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 12:12 PM, Tong Fin (JIRA) < uima-dev@incubator.apache.org> wrote: > [DDE] Support editing

[jira] Created: (UIMA-1136) [DDE] Support editing of Prefetch value and set default value to 0 (instead of 1)

[DDE] Support editing of Prefetch value and set default value to 0 (instead of 1) - Key: UIMA-1136 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1136 Project: UIMA

Re: [jira] Commented: (UIMA-1130) Deployment Descriptor should allow setting the number of concurrent listeners for a reply queue

It looks like we agree on the Eddie's original proposal and Marshall's suggestion to add "concurrentConsumers" (NOT "concurrantConsumers" ?) as an attribute to element. I will proceed to modify DDE and submit the patch unless someone speaks up :) - Tong On Wed, Aug 6, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Adam La

[jira] Commented: (UIMA-1130) Deployment Descriptor should allow setting the number of concurrent listeners for a reply queue

[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1130?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12620271#action_12620271 ] Adam Lally commented on UIMA-1130: -- I think Eddie is probably right that increasing the num