What should happen if a is specified for a
delegate whose typesystem is not the same as the merged one, or is running
2.2.2 and doesn't support binary serialization? Presumably we should fail
the deployment. If the serialization method is not specified then we could
default to binary if all the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637997#action_12637997
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1196:
--
I agree. We probably should add 2 Jira's to
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637998#action_12637998
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1196:
--
While Jerry was testing this he discovered that
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1196?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12637988#action_12637988
]
Jerry Cwiklik commented on UIMA-1196:
-
While addressing binary serialization I need to d
I submitted a report. Please feel free to correct any details :-)
-Marshall
Thilo Goetz wrote:
> We need to report this month, by the 8th.
>
> --Thilo
>
>
>
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 1:48 PM, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please cast your vote to accept the Configurable Feature Extractor into
> the sandbox.
>
> There was a discussion on this on uima-user list (see
> http://markmail.org/message/ty6eq4ne7r4rvtim ) that ended with a request
>
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1107?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Aaron Kaplan reopened UIMA-1107:
I just tested this fix for the first time, and it doesn't resolve the problem.
The symptoms are exactl
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1199?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Burn Lewis updated UIMA-1199:
-
Attachment: UIMA-1199-test.patch
UIMA-1199-test.patch adds a test case for this problem.
Note: patch assum
