[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor reassigned UIMA-1251:
Assignee: Marshall Schor
> If one delegate in an aggregate uses a JMS service descriptor and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Marshall Schor closed UIMA-1250.
Resolution: Fixed
Fix Version/s: 2.3
Assignee: Marshall Schor
After some more though
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657179#action_12657179
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1250:
--
Many of the framework calls use UIMAFramework.g
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657171#action_12657171
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1250:
--
Actually, many of the logging calls in the fram
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657170#action_12657170
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1250:
--
After some investigation - it looks quite invol
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1254:
Attachment: uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1254-patch.txt
uimaj-as-activemq-UIMA-1254-patch.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1254:
Attachment: (was: uimaj-as-activemq-UIMA-1223-patch.txt)
> UIMA AS Aggregate ServiceInfo JMX Com
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1254:
Attachment: (was: uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1223-patch.txt)
> UIMA AS Aggregate ServiceInfo JMX Compone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1254?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Jerry Cwiklik updated UIMA-1254:
Attachment: uimaj-as-core-UIMA-1223-patch.txt
uimaj-as-activemq-UIMA-1223-patch.txt
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1247?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally closed UIMA-1247.
This fix works for me. Thanks!
> MBean Registration not thread-safe
> --
>
>
UIMA AS Aggregate ServiceInfo JMX Component is Missing Broker URL
--
Key: UIMA-1254
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1254
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
UIMA-AS Can't run Aggregate containing a CAS Consumer delegate
--
Key: UIMA-1253
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1253
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Compone
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1252?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Adam Lally deleted UIMA-1252:
-
> UIMA-Can't run
> ---
>
> Key: UIMA-1252
> URL: https://issues.a
UIMA-Can't run
---
Key: UIMA-1252
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1252
Project: UIMA
Issue Type: Bug
Reporter: Adam Lally
Priority: Minor
--
This message is automatically generated by
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12657134#action_12657134
]
Marshall Schor commented on UIMA-1250:
--
It's not clear to me what the correct operation
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1251?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Burn Lewis updated UIMA-1251:
-
Attachment: UIMA-1251.patch
This patch catches the exception, calls destroy on the aggregate, and rethrows
If one delegate in an aggregate uses a JMS service descriptor and another fails
to initialize, the JVM fails to terminate
-
Key: UIMA-1251
URL:
Some initialization messages may not appear as the Logger object changes during
initialization
--
Key: UIMA-1250
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1250
Thanks for the update, that are good news!
-- Michael
Michael Tanenblatt wrote:
> Just to followup on the comment about ConceptMapper: I am in the process
> of putting together documentation right now, and hope to have that done
> by the end of this week. There is also a code change that was requ
Just to followup on the comment about ConceptMapper: I am in the
process of putting together documentation right now, and hope to have
that done by the end of this week. There is also a code change that
was requested by someone that I want to make, and then I will do
whatever I need to do t
+0 because I doubt that there are many users who need a tool like
this, but there is no reason to block it.
Jörn
On Dec 16, 2008, at 8:31 AM, Michael Baessler wrote:
Sorry I'm late... thanks for the reminder.
Here is a +0 from my side.
Let me explain why I'm not so convinced about this submi
21 matches
Mail list logo