Thilo Goetz wrote:
CAS.declareFsVariable(String name, Type type)
CAS.isFsVariable(String name):boolean
CAS.getFsVariableType(String name):Type
I would like to have an additional method like
CAS.getFsVariableForType(Type type):FS
so that an analysis component do not have to know the variable
Jörn Kottmann wrote:
Please let me know if you think this is a good idea, and if so, if
you're in favor of the dynamically typed or the pseudo-statically
typed version.
Can you explain what is the reason to not declare the type inside the
type system ?
Thanks,
Jörn
Jörn, I'm not sure I
On 1/11/07, Michael Baessler [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thilo Goetz wrote:
CAS.declareFsVariable(String name, Type type)
CAS.isFsVariable(String name):boolean
CAS.getFsVariableType(String name):Type
I would like to have an additional method like
CAS.getFsVariableForType(Type type):FS
so that
Having not heard a user request for global variables, I'm a little
fuzzy on the use case. However, if I understand correctly what is
suggested is a combination of:
1. a new built in type with two features.
2. a slight variation on the set index, where instead of silently
ignoring a duplicate FS
On 1/11/07, Eddie Epstein [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Having not heard a user request for global variables, I'm a little
fuzzy on the use case.
I think one use case is the singleton use case. You could define a
global variable called myapp.documentMetadata and set its value to
an instance of
