Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-08-06 Thread Marshall Schor
Hi Rico - thanks for the reminder :-) I'll add it... -Marshall Rico Landefeld wrote: > hi there, > > Lucas should be part of the upcomming 2.3.0 release. > > rico > > > On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Tong Fin wrote: > Is the SimpleUimaAsService ready for prime time? I don't recal

Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-08-06 Thread Rico Landefeld
hi there, Lucas should be part of the upcomming 2.3.0 release. rico On Thu, Jul 30, 2009 at 12:56 AM, Tong Fin wrote: >> > Is the SimpleUimaAsService ready for prime time?  I don't >> > recall what it was, but I was looking at it the other day >> > and thought it didn't look quite ready yet.  M

Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-07-29 Thread Tong Fin
> > Is the SimpleUimaAsService ready for prime time? I don't > > recall what it was, but I was looking at it the other day > > and thought it didn't look quite ready yet. Maybe I'm > > mistaken. For example, it has the SimpleServer jars > > checked in as binaries. We surely don't want that, so

Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-07-29 Thread Marshall Schor
Thilo Goetz wrote: > Marshall Schor wrote: > >> Let's get a list of sandbox projects we plan to include in the >> 2.3.0-incubating release. >> >> The reason for doing this is to better update the version info for the >> sandbox. For uimaj we use maven properties and have the version info in >>

Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-07-28 Thread Thilo Goetz
Marshall Schor wrote: > Let's get a list of sandbox projects we plan to include in the > 2.3.0-incubating release. > > The reason for doing this is to better update the version info for the > sandbox. For uimaj we use maven properties and have the version info in > just one place for all the pro

Re: next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-07-28 Thread Marshall Schor
Marshall Schor wrote: > Let's get a list of sandbox projects we plan to include in the > 2.3.0-incubating release. > > The reason for doing this is to better update the version info for the > sandbox. For uimaj we use maven properties and have the version info in > just one place for all the pr

next release plan - sandbox - which components?

2009-07-28 Thread Marshall Schor
Let's get a list of sandbox projects we plan to include in the 2.3.0-incubating release. The reason for doing this is to better update the version info for the sandbox. For uimaj we use maven properties and have the version info in just one place for all the projects. We could do that too, for

Re: Release plan

2007-01-21 Thread Marshall Schor
Adam Lally wrote: On 1/17/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What testing beyond the unit tests will we do for this release? Here are some items to consider: 1) "test" that all the Jira changes that would affect the documentation have had the documentation updated 2) "Functional" te

Re: Release plan

2007-01-19 Thread Adam Lally
On 1/17/07, Marshall Schor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What testing beyond the unit tests will we do for this release? Here are some items to consider: 1) "test" that all the Jira changes that would affect the documentation have had the documentation updated 2) "Functional" testing, Installation

Re: Release plan

2007-01-17 Thread Marshall Schor
What testing beyond the unit tests will we do for this release? Here are some items to consider: 1) "test" that all the Jira changes that would affect the documentation have had the documentation updated 2) "Functional" testing, Installation verification testing (I think we need a detailed lis

Re: Release plan

2007-01-10 Thread Adam Lally
07 - 2/4/07: testing & bug fixing 2/5/07: cut the release, start the vote 2/15/07: release UIMA 2.1 Let me know what you think. I'll add this to the Wiki once we have agreement on the dev list. I'm assuming we're still on this release plan, though I think

Re: Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Thilo Goetz
Adam Lally wrote: ... I'm a little less sure about the plan (on the Wiki) to have a minor release (2.2, 2.3) about every 3 months, without knowing what enhancements we want to get in. I could see releasing something about every 3 months, if in some cases it would just be a maintenance release (e

Re: Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Adam Lally
On 12/19/06, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: now - 1/21/07:coding, general enhancements 1/22/07 - 2/4/07: testing & bug fixing 2/5/07: cut the release, start the vote 2/15/07: release UIMA 2.1 +1 to this schedule. I'm a little less sure about the plan (on the Wik

Re: Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Thilo Goetz
Marshall Schor wrote: +1 from me, too. I would include running "RAT" as part of the process. http://code.google.com/p/arat/ -Marshall Absolutely. My plan is to get UIMA RAT-ready till the end of the year, or at least have a very clear idea what issues remain. I expect that most people wil

Re: Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Marshall Schor
+1 from me, too. I would include running "RAT" as part of the process. http://code.google.com/p/arat/ -Marshall Michael Baessler wrote: Thilo Goetz wrote: I have added a short page on a release plan to the Wiki. I'm sure this isn't the final word, and we'll

Re: Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Michael Baessler
Thilo Goetz wrote: I have added a short page on a release plan to the Wiki. I'm sure this isn't the final word, and we'll keep refining it as we go. Given this is our first release in the Incubator, and from what I've been observing on [EMAIL PROTECTED], I think we shoul

Release plan

2006-12-19 Thread Thilo Goetz
I have added a short page on a release plan to the Wiki. I'm sure this isn't the final word, and we'll keep refining it as we go. Given this is our first release in the Incubator, and from what I've been observing on [EMAIL PROTECTED], I think we should calculate about 2