On 12/13/06, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I thought the default PEAR directory layout was optional. It would be
> nice if the Maven layout were supported.
I don't think the UIMA nature is optional. Some of the directories must
exist but maybe we can change that...
I think onl
Adam Lally wrote:
Hmmm.. how hard would it be to have a pear packager that runs outside
of Eclipse? It does seem like a poor dependency to have since we
claim UIMA doesn't require Eclipse.
So in that case we can also think about creating a pear package during
the build.
I will check if it is po
On 12/13/06, Michael Baessler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- To package a analysis component as pear file we have to use eclipse,
since we do not have a pear packager outside of eclipse. So users have
to use eclipse if they want to package an analysis component.
Hmmm.. how hard would it be to hav
Hi,
when writing the first analysis component for the UIMA sandbox I came to
the point where I have to provide a build for the component.
My first thought was to do this also with Maven but when trying to add
the pom.xml some incompatibilities came to my mind.
- To package a analysis componen
