Re: generics: ResourceFactory.produceResource

2009-08-20 Thread Jörn Kottmann
Adam Lally wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote: The current declaration with out generics: public Resource produceResource(Class aResourceClass, ResourceSpecifier aSpecifier, MapString, Object aAdditionalParams) throws

Re: generics: ResourceFactory.produceResource

2009-08-20 Thread Adam Lally
On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 8:11 AM, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote: Adam Lally wrote: On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote: The current declaration with out generics:  public Resource produceResource(Class aResourceClass, ResourceSpecifier aSpecifier,

generics: ResourceFactory.produceResource

2009-08-19 Thread Jörn Kottmann
The current declaration with out generics: public Resource produceResource(Class aResourceClass, ResourceSpecifier aSpecifier, MapString, Object aAdditionalParams) throws ResourceInitializationException; Can it be assumed that aResourceClass is always a class which extends

Re: generics: ResourceFactory.produceResource

2009-08-19 Thread Adam Lally
On Wed, Aug 19, 2009 at 1:54 PM, Jörn Kottmannkottm...@gmail.com wrote: The current declaration with out generics:  public Resource produceResource(Class aResourceClass, ResourceSpecifier aSpecifier,         MapString, Object aAdditionalParams) throws ResourceInitializationException; Can