Adam Lally wrote:
...
I don't feel strongly about this so I won't object to calling it v2.1.
Same here. No strong feelings. This is exactly what wicket is doing,
btw. They're going from 2.2 pre-Apache to 2.3 Apache (or similar, don't
quote me on the specific release number).
--Thilo
On 11/13/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them? I
>think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
>because:
>
>1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
>work is
>Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them? I
>think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
>because:
>
>1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
>work is on Apache
>2) it signals that Apache UIMA is the release th
Thinking about our customer base, what would be least confusing to them? I
think calling this release Apache UIMA 2.1 (Incubating) would be good
because:
1) it signals that 2.0.x is the end of the line for that series, new
work is on Apache
2) it signals that Apache UIMA is the release that
Adam Lally wrote:
Now see, if we had just changed the name of the project then we could
have reset our version number to 1.0 without any problem. :) Now all
options seem flawed: If we call it 2.1, it seems strange to me that
2.x would be split with 2.0 being com.ibm and 2.1 being org.apache.
On
On 11/13/06, Thilo Goetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Our version is currently called 1.0-SNAPSHOT, which is the Maven
default. What are we going to call this version, anyway? We have 2.0
out already, and the move to Apache justifies a major version hike, to
my mind. 3.0, anyone? Or are we star
Marshall Schor wrote:
There's a discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how to name releases
when using Maven, that includes the word "incubator" / "incubating".
Adam - if our releases aren't this way already, could you open an Jira
issue and fix?
-Marshall
Our version is currently called 1.
There's a discussion on [EMAIL PROTECTED] about how to name releases
when using Maven, that includes the word "incubator" / "incubating".
Adam - if our releases aren't this way already, could you open an Jira
issue and fix?
-Marshall
