Sorry for not being clear. I was unclear from the documentation as to
whether the intent of the capabilities section of the Analysis Engine
Descriptors was to provide external guarantees provided by the framework
on the input/outputs to the annotator code or to provide a means for the
annotator
So, is there any actual interest in accepting this into the sandbox?
Discussions died down with no resolution.
...m
On May 15, 2008, at 12:24 PM, Igor Sominsky wrote:
My group would like to offer the following UIMA component, Common
Feature Extractor (CFE), as an open source offering into
I didn't find any way to assign the issue to you so here you are:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-1053
Best regards,
Richard
Am 29.05.2008 um 11:29 schrieb Michael Baessler:
Richard Eckart wrote:
Hi,
You may know that there is a similar documentation available for the
PEAR
LeHouillier, Frank D. wrote:
Sorry for not being clear. I was unclear from the documentation as to
whether the intent of the capabilities section of the Analysis Engine
Descriptors was to provide external guarantees provided by the framework
on the input/outputs to the annotator code or to
Marshall,
This may be frustrating/annoying feedback. Last summer I sent a few
emails to the list about unit testing uima components using groovy and
probably said a few other positive things about groovy. We have since
abandoned groovy for a variety of reasons. Here are a few:
- unit
Hi Philip -
I appreciate your feedback. I too have had a bit of a love/hate
relationship with Groovy. It annoyed me so much when I started using it
(your post a while back got me started in looking into it) that I tried
a few things, then dropped it. I recently thought I'd give it another
