Hello,
I was trying to run the OpenNLP UIMA wrapper OpenNLPAggregate.xml
from the UIMA examples (org.apache.uima.examples.opennlp.annotators)
and load it in the CAS Visual Debugger. I got the following Java
exception:
Exception in thread AWT-EventQueue-0
That probably means the OpenNLP library was compiler with a newer version of
Java. Try switching to a higher version number. (The message usually
indicates the version number, e.g. 6 for Java 1.6)
Burn.
Hi!
Concrete situation: I have an UIMA Annotator; developed by me and works fine
with UIMA.But if I like running this annotator from a third party software
(this program gets only the descriptor xml file and an input directory, self
the annotator has own, special output), always I get annotator
I have a set of annotators bundled as an aggregate AE and configured in
a CPE. It runs fine with a single thread, but deadlocked with 2 or more
threads. The AE was developed without any consideration of
thread-safety. I am trying to find out the possible causes of the
deadlocks, and hope to get
Perhaps just before you call produceAnalysisEngine you could print the value
of the java.class.path property, to verify that the UIMA classes have been
specified via -cp or whatever.
Burn.
Zoltán Szászi wrote:
Hi!
Concrete situation: I have an UIMA Annotator; developed by me and works fine
with UIMA.But if I like running this annotator from a third party software
(this program gets only the descriptor xml file and an input directory, self
the annotator has own, special
It may be worth pointing out that there is a very nice set of uima
wrappers for OpenNLP available from their sourceforge cvs repository.
See http://opennlp.cvs.sourceforge.net/opennlp/. While this is still a
work in progress - it is *much* nicer than the example wrappers that
ship with UIMA.
Hi,
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Duan, Nick nick.d...@mantech.com wrote:
I have a set of annotators bundled as an aggregate AE and configured in
a CPE. It runs fine with a single thread, but deadlocked with 2 or more
threads. The AE was developed without any consideration of
Thanks Adam for the detailed response! The document that stated the number
processing pipelines vs. the CAS pool size is on page 44 of the UIMA References
(version 2.2.2). Has anyone done any empirical test on what would be the best
ratio of # threads to CAS pool size? Or any consideration
Yes, this note is certainly wrong!
*The number of Processing Pipelines should be equal to or greater than CAS
Pool size. *
The tutorial gets it right.
My understanding is that there is a separate CasConsumer thread and only the
portion of the pipeline before the first CasConsumer runs in the
On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:39 PM, Burn Lewis burnle...@gmail.com wrote:
My understanding is that there is a separate CasConsumer thread and only the
portion of the pipeline before the first CasConsumer runs in the pipeline
thread(s). The first CasConsumer and all following CasProcessors run in
11 matches
Mail list logo
