On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Bartosz SKOWRON wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Adriano Marques wrote:
>
>> If we don't run on 2.4 currently is due to minor details, than it's
>> better to find then, fix and support 2.4 at least. 2.3 is going to be
>> harder, and maybe useless to suppo
On Fri, Dec 26, 2008 at 9:51 AM, Adriano Marques wrote:
> If we don't run on 2.4 currently is due to minor details, than it's
> better to find then, fix and support 2.4 at least. 2.3 is going to be
> harder, and maybe useless to support, as I'm not sure if people will
> find all our libraries for
