Hi all,
I totally support the whole idea. That's what I'm standing for... Go
Umit Project, Go!
On Mon, May 4, 2009 at 6:41 PM, Luis A. Bastiao Silva
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I read all your long email with attention, and I really appreciate.
> Thanks for become it clear. :)
>
> And I'm also agree wit
Hello,
I read all your long email with attention, and I really appreciate.
Thanks for become it clear. :)
And I'm also agree with it.
João: yes it is Our goals and I'm glad that you solved all issues ;)
Best Regards,
--
Luís A. Bastião Silva
Hello João!
> No objections. I understand all your (or, better say, our) goals. Now,
> I think there is no divergent thoughts about Zion, specifically.
> Zion's branch is already using the namespace proposed by you and Luis
> and I'm agree with that. Congratulations, great e-mail.
Thanks for your
Hi Adriano.
No objections. I understand all your (or, better say, our) goals. Now,
I think there is no divergent thoughts about Zion, specifically.
Zion's branch is already using the namespace proposed by you and Luis
and I'm agree with that. Congratulations, great e-mail.
Att, João Medeiros.
PS
Hello Folks,
This morning, after reading all the e-mails concerning this matter, I
just realized that we're all (including myself) misunderstanding some
basic concepts. First, I would like to state that Umit != Umit
Project, and I would like to ask everyone to make that clear when
writing
