Hi,
it should not depend on dosemu, the windows installer should support
ntfs. If you can remember your last non-unattended installation: you can
format a drive with ntfs for the installation. So it is supported by the
windows installer. Also the installation with the nt5install script
should work, but the boocode is different and in other sectors than in
FAT32. So just take a look here:
http://www.ntfs.com/ntfs-partition-boot-sector.htm

To extract the boot code from an exisiting ntfs-partition:
dd if=/dev/sda1 of=bootstrap_vista_sektor_1.bin bs=1 skip=84 count=426
dd if=/dev/sda1 of=bootstrap_vista_sektor_2.bin bs=1 skip=512 count=7680
Restore in the other way and with "seek" insted "skip".

You will need the following packages on the boot-cd:
ntfs-3g (http://www.ntfs-3g.org) (for mounting/writing)
ntfsprogs (http://www.linux-ntfs.org/) for formatting
fuse (for ntfs-3g)

It would not work with the dos bootdisks, but if you integrate an ntfs
driver for dos (there was an comercial version from sysinternals.com,
but sysinternals is moved to the microsoft site... and now I cant dfind
the ntfsdos an more... ).

Hope this spend some time for you....
greetings mario

Am Sonntag, den 27.01.2008, 02:00 +0100 schrieb Nagilum:
> Hi
> 
> As mentioned before, it would be nice, if we could hold existing NTFS
> partitions for install.
> My question is: Why doesn't that work? Does DOSEMU don't like it?
> The Kernel supports NTFS a longer time ago and since a while it also has a
> good writing-support.
> 
> Would be usefull if we could just format drive c/1st Partition and keep the
> rest, e.g. for E-Mail-/data-/driverbackup.
> 
> Regards
>  - Nagilum



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
unattended-devel mailing list
unattended-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/unattended-devel

Reply via email to