Pierre Bourgin escribió:
IMHO, it should be sufficient to define and describe precisely what is the
official or reference platform for building Unattended: linux distribution
flavor, exact versions of gcc and glibc of the host system, etc.
Debian 5.0 (Lenny). I was happy with previous
Allan Lyons a écrit :
In looking over some stuff, I couldn't come up with a reason why we still
have dosemu.
What does the dosemu code-path give us that the newer nt5x-install
method does not? I know it was there historically, but what features
does it have that are missing in the newer
Allan Lyons escribió:
Hi,
Our basic problem is that our
tool chain is getting contaminated by the host build system.
agree with it. But not many people get into build up the linuxboot, plus
getting a recent kernel seem to resolve the issues for many of our users.
Since we are effectly
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Pierre Bourgin
pierre.bour...@arteris.comwrote:
Allan Lyons a écrit :
In looking over some stuff, I couldn't come up with a reason why we still
have dosemu.
What does the dosemu code-path give us that the newer nt5x-install
method does not? I know it was
insrc a écrit :
On Wed, Jul 8, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Pierre Bourgin
pierre.bour...@arteris.comwrote:
Allan Lyons a écrit :
In looking over some stuff, I couldn't come up with a reason why we still
have dosemu.
What does the dosemu code-path give us that the newer nt5x-install
method does not?
On 8/07/2009 5:00 PM, insrc wrote:
Yep, i'm glad that dosemu is still there as i can't do unattended
installation with nt5x-install method
Same... In our case, the dosemu works on all our computers, but the nt5x
method seems to fail on a few of the newer ones. It does it's thing, but
once it
Allan Lyons escribió:
In looking over some stuff, I couldn't come up with a reason why we still
have dosemu. What does the dosemu code-path give us that
the newer nt5x-install method does not? I know it was there historically,
but what features does it have that are missing in the
newer
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:21:44PM +1000, Tim Bates wrote:
I have all ours set to create a full drive partition. The failures don't
seem to have any pattern beyond being mostly the newer PCs.
What type of computer are they?
Allan.
Tirsdag 7. juli 2009, skrev Allan Lyons:
Our basic
problem is that our tool chain is getting contaminated by the host build
system.
This is a major pain.
Even if we all use debian stable it will be differences in the compiled
product.
There are roughly two parts to Unattended. One part is
Onsdag 8. juli 2009, skrev Allan Lyons:
In looking over some stuff, I couldn't come up with a reason why we still
have dosemu. What does the dosemu code-path give us that the newer
nt5x-install method does not? I know it was there historically, but what
features does it have that are missing
On Tuesday 07 July 2009 19:39:08 Juan Jose Pablos wrote:
Pierre Bourgin escribió:
IMHO, it should be sufficient to define and describe precisely what is
the official or reference platform for building Unattended: linux
distribution flavor, exact versions of gcc and glibc of the host system,
Well, I cant give you any first hand reasons as I have not used dosemu since
I
posted the very first stumbling nt5x-install patches here.
To me it seems like the trouble people have with nt5x-install
is the old bios geometry and limitations in FAT.
When we throw shaky microsoft and
Allan Lyons wrote:
On Wed, Jul 08, 2009 at 08:21:44PM +1000, Tim Bates wrote:
I have all ours set to create a full drive partition. The failures don't
seem to have any pattern beyond being mostly the newer PCs.
What type of computer are they?
Random Lenovo desktops ranging from 4
13 matches
Mail list logo
