Re: trust-anchor-file, auto-trust-anchor-file, trust-anchor

2017-02-24 Thread Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users
Edward Lewis via Unbound-users wrote: > Is the use of trust-anchor-file for the public root zone KSK popular? Do > folks use it much at all (regardless of zone)? The same for trust-anchor > statements, which appear to be in-line of the configuration file. Hi, Ed: We ship the Debian package

Relation between ub_fd/ub_poll/ub_process and ub_ctx_async

2017-02-24 Thread Rick van Rein via Unbound-users
Hello, I'm not quite clear on the relation between ub_ctx_async() on the one hand, and ub_fd(), ub_poll() and ub_process() the other hand. The latter triple can clearly be integrated with an event loop, but the former seems to suggest that background threads or processes are used. If I use

trust-anchor-file, auto-trust-anchor-file, trust-anchor

2017-02-24 Thread Edward Lewis via Unbound-users
>From reading the documentation, the difference between trust-anchor-file and >auto-trust-anchor-file is that the former is manually managed, the latter open >to Automated Updates (RFC 5011) management - is that correct? Is the use of trust-anchor-file for the public root zone KSK popular? Do