Re: TLS and local unbound-control

2018-05-04 Thread Simon Deziel via Unbound-users
On 2018-05-04 04:41 PM, Marc Branchaud wrote: > On 2018-05-04 04:21 PM, Simon Deziel via Unbound-users wrote: >> Hi Marc, >> >> On 2018-05-04 04:12 PM, Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users wrote: >>> So I'd like to request that: (a) unbound-control avoids using TLS when >>> communicating over a local s

Re: TLS and local unbound-control

2018-05-04 Thread Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users
On 2018-05-04 04:12 PM, Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users wrote: Hi all, (Please bear with me in the following; some of this might be mere correlation and not causation.) I've recently switched from OpenSSL 0.9.8 to 1.0.1.  I've noticed that my unbound-control commands now take significantly

Re: TLS and local unbound-control

2018-05-04 Thread Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users
On 2018-05-04 04:21 PM, Simon Deziel via Unbound-users wrote: Hi Marc, On 2018-05-04 04:12 PM, Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users wrote: So I'd like to request that: (a) unbound-control avoids using TLS when communicating over a local socket You can use "control-use-cert: no" in the remote-contr

Re: TLS and local unbound-control

2018-05-04 Thread Simon Deziel via Unbound-users
Hi Marc, On 2018-05-04 04:12 PM, Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users wrote: > So I'd like to request that: (a) unbound-control avoids using TLS when > communicating over a local socket You can use "control-use-cert: no" in the remote-control section. HTH, Simon

TLS and local unbound-control

2018-05-04 Thread Marc Branchaud via Unbound-users
Hi all, (Please bear with me in the following; some of this might be mere correlation and not causation.) I've recently switched from OpenSSL 0.9.8 to 1.0.1. I've noticed that my unbound-control commands now take significantly longer to complete. The "stats" command in particular takes ~3 s