Tomas Hozza via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 04.11.2015 17:35, Phil Mayers wrote:
> > The code tries to open an IPv6 socket, the kernel tries to load the module,
> > SELinux denies and logs this. Each of these items is by design. Which are
> > you suggesting should change?
>
> I think it makes
Hi Phil.
Sorry for the late response.
On 04.11.2015 17:35, Phil Mayers wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 15:49, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>
>> If you have some strong technical argument for this behavior I would
>> be more than glad to hear it. The reason is that similar people will
>> fight hard against having
On 04/11/2015 00:32, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote:
Paul Wouters via Unbound-users wrote:
FYI:
rhbz#1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in
/etc/sysctl.conf
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
Paul
Hi, Paul:
I'm a bit confused
On 04.11.2015 12:35, Phil Mayers via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 00:32, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote:
> > Paul Wouters via Unbound-users wrote:
> >> FYI:
> >>
> >> rhbz#1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in
&
On 04/11/2015 15:49, Tomas Hozza wrote:
If you have some strong technical argument for this behavior I would
be more than glad to hear it. The reason is that similar people will
fight hard against having Unbound as the default DNS resolver in
Fedora, which is our ultimate plan. Ability to spare
Hi,
Phil Mayers via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 15:49, Tomas Hozza wrote:
>
> >If you have some strong technical argument for this behavior I would
> >be more than glad to hear it. The reason is that similar people will
> >fight hard against having Unbound as the default DNS resolver in
Phil Mayers via Unbound-users wrote:
> On 04/11/2015 17:21, Robert Edmonds wrote:
> >Is the problem perhaps that "ipv6.disable=1" on the kernel command line
> >should be accompanied by "alias net-pf-10 off" in the modprobe
> >configuration in order to prevent useless autoloading attempts?
>
> Is
On 04/11/2015 17:21, Robert Edmonds wrote:
If I understand correctly, there is no ipv6.ko module on the kernel in
question that can be autoloaded; at least on my Fedora 20 and CentOS 7
machines, the kernels are built with CONFIG_IPV6=y.
Good point; that's what I see too (and an entirely
Paul Wouters via Unbound-users wrote:
> FYI:
>
> rhbz#1231946 - unbound-anchor ignores net.ipv6.conf.all.disable_ipv6=1 in
> /etc/sysctl.conf
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231946
>
> Paul
Hi, Paul:
I'm a bit confused. unbound-anchor is an or
