Re: rfc6761 compliance

2015-09-22 Thread W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi Robert, Andreas, On 11/09/15 17:54, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote: > A. Schulze via Unbound-users wrote: >> Hello, >> >> the RFC 6761 give some advise how caching DNS servers SHOULD >> handle queries for reserved domains. Mostly it

Re: rfc6761 compliance

2015-09-22 Thread Paul Wouters via Unbound-users
On Tue, 22 Sep 2015, Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users wrote: W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote: It is not a particularly heavy root server load to mitigate, less code is better and easier, the unblock-lan-zones statement is a frequently asked question from our users. That said, we

Re: rfc6761 compliance

2015-09-22 Thread Robert Edmonds via Unbound-users
W.C.A. Wijngaards via Unbound-users wrote: > It is not a particularly heavy root server load to mitigate, less code > is better and easier, the unblock-lan-zones statement is a frequently > asked question from our users. That said, we could add new code for > this (and .onion?). Hi, Wouter: I

rfc6761 compliance

2015-09-11 Thread A. Schulze via Unbound-users
Hello, the RFC 6761 give some advise how caching DNS servers SHOULD handle queries for reserved domains. Mostly it say "do not send queries to the root name servers" ... point 4 in any case ... http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6761#section-6.2 ( domain "test." )