Re: Fwd: Re: DNS versus NAT ?

2019-06-15 Thread John Levine via Unbound-users
In article <8edb08ac-5f86-04b7-7b7e-8bf1eb253...@gmail.com> you write: >You may not need a "cloudish sort of place." It really depends your user >count. A residence or small business doesn't generate that many "new" >domain queries in 24 hours. I'm pretty sure that when Ron said 64K outstanding

Re: Fwd: Re: DNS versus NAT ?

2019-06-15 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette via Unbound-users
In message <20190615154602.3bd08201591...@ary.qy>, John Levine wrote: >In article <8edb08ac-5f86-04b7-7b7e-8bf1eb253...@gmail.com> you write: >>You may not need a "cloudish sort of place." It really depends your user >>count. A residence or small business doesn't generate that many "new"

Re: Fwd: Re: DNS versus NAT ?

2019-06-15 Thread Ronald F. Guilmette via Unbound-users
In message <624735c3-296a-f0d7-519c-3c7532744...@wagsky.com>, Jeff Kletsky wrote: >Many SOHO all-in-one routers are running Linux kernels. Yes, I believe that mine is. >Of course, if you're really running that kind of DNS volume >and the TCP traffic that would usually go with it, you're

Re: Fwd: Re: DNS versus NAT ?

2019-06-15 Thread Jeff Kletsky via Unbound-users
On 6/15/19 1:56 PM, Ronald F. Guilmette via Unbound-users wrote: In message <20190615154602.3bd08201591...@ary.qy>, John Levine wrote: In article <8edb08ac-5f86-04b7-7b7e-8bf1eb253...@gmail.com> you write: You may not need a "cloudish sort of place." It really depends your user count. A