Re: 1.7.1 qname-minimisation and Akamai?

2018-06-12 Thread Petr Špaček via Unbound-users
On 11.6.2018 23:31, Håkan Lindqvist via Unbound-users wrote: Hi, I ran into and issue where it appears that Unbound 1.7.1 fails to resolve some Akamai CDN names if qname-minimisation is enabled (consistently responds with SERVFAIL). 1.7.0 did not exhibit the same behavior with identical confi

Re: 1.7.1 qname-minimisation and Akamai?

2018-06-12 Thread Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users
Hi Hakan, This is indeed related to the CNAME classification change in 1.7.1. After that change responses for the minimised queries can be treated as CNAME responses. Unbound has a limit in number of CNAMEs to follow to prevent loops, that limit is 8. Because the nameserver here gives CNAMEs for f

Re: 1.7.1 qname-minimisation and Akamai?

2018-06-12 Thread Håkan Lindqvist via Unbound-users
Ok, that sounds great. Thank you! /Håkan On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 4:36 PM, Ralph Dolmans via Unbound-users < unbound-users@unbound.net> wrote: > Hi Hakan, > > This is indeed related to the CNAME classification change in 1.7.1. > After that change responses for the minimised queries can be treated