Re: Euro

2000-07-31 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote: http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/euro/euroglyph.html So you're taking it a "C"?

Re: Euro

2000-07-31 Thread John Cowan
Roozbeh Pournader wrote: On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote: http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/euro/euroglyph.html So you're taking it a "C"? I am realizing that people think the "I" of this page is me! It is not; I am not a font designer. Send kudos or criticism to Michael

Re: Euro

2000-07-31 Thread Roozbeh Pournader
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote: I am realizing that people think the "I" of this page is me! It is not; I am not a font designer. Send kudos or criticism to Michael Everson [EMAIL PROTECTED]. Sorry, I even didn't look at the sender's name! I thought it should have been Michael

(no subject)

2000-07-31 Thread Zhen Ren
Hello, all. How do I print the superscript minus sign? The unicode for this is \u207B. However, it is not printed correctly. Instead, it is an unrecognized character. Thanks a lot. Zhen Ren Get Your Private, Free

FW: Unicode konversion

2000-07-31 Thread Magda Danish (Unicode)
-Original Message- From: Tobias Schafhitzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 11:11 AM To: Magda Danish (Unicode) Subject: RE: Unicode konversion Dear Magda Danish, now there's a new problem. I have an UTF-16 Widecharacter string and want to convert it to

Re: Cost per character?

2000-07-31 Thread James E. Agenbroad
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Christopher J. Fynn wrote: Leaving aside implementation costs - has anyone ever come up with a good estimate of the cost per character for the development of the Unicode / ISO 10646 standards in terms of man hours of experts and their long-suffering secretaries, the

Re: FW: Unicode konversion

2000-07-31 Thread addison
The call to WideCharToMultiByte takes a code page as an argument (if you leave it blank it uses the default code page). When you convert a string with Unicode characters to "multi-byte", you are actually converting it to a legacy, non-Unicode, character set. Only the characters actually

FW: what is it ??????

2000-07-31 Thread Magda Danish (Unicode)
-Original Message- From: Thomas Hartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 5:08 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: what is it ?? Hi , I am looking for the Unicode: 0x323ae0 Its an xml exception. Can you give me a hand and find out what character it is ? thanks

Re: Addition of remaining two Maltese Characters to Unicode

2000-07-31 Thread Christopher J. Fynn
"Angelo Dalli" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Note that representing these two digraphs is fraught with problems, especially due to the context sensitive capitalisation rules. ‘gh’ at the start of a word is capitalised as ‘Gh’ while for an all-capitals word it is written as ‘GH’. Similarly

Re: Addition of remaining two Maltese Characters to Unicode

2000-07-31 Thread Tiro Typeworks
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Angelo Dalli wrote: These characters are the only two digraphs in the Maltese language, namely the consonant 'gh' (where h is stroked) and the sixth vowel 'ie'. Though these characters can be rendered onscreen using separate characters, they are actually defined as

RE: Addition of remaining two Maltese Characters to Unicode

2000-07-31 Thread Peter_Constable
I interpreted this to mean that he wanted to be able to form two different constructs using the same letters, e.g. i + e for an English loan word, but i + ZWJ + e for native Maltese words... Rather than ZWJ, there is a pending proposal being considered by UTC for a ZW GRAPHEME JOINER that

Re: Encoding of non-characters

2000-07-31 Thread Doug Ewell
Mark Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] or perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Let me repeat your example. A UTF-16BE converter takes the codepoints (aka scalar values) code points: U+DC00 U+D800 U+DC00 U+D800 U+ Not exactly the same as my example, which didn't have the trailing U+. But it

FTP problem

2000-07-31 Thread Doug Ewell
I have not been able to log in to the Unicode FTP site for several days. Just a friendly note to the FTP administrators in case they were not previously aware of any problems. -Doug Ewell Fullerton, California

Erratum on Unicode Web site

2000-07-31 Thread Doug Ewell
I like the new layout of the Unicode Web site. It presents a clean, uniform, and dignified look. I can't think of many Web sites that can say the same. I did find a typo, however. From the page titled "Technical Work" at http://www.unicode.org/unicode/techwork.html: The Unicode Standard was