On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote:
http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/euro/euroglyph.html
So you're taking it a "C"?
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
On Sun, 30 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote:
http://www.egt.ie/standards/iso10646/euro/euroglyph.html
So you're taking it a "C"?
I am realizing that people think the "I" of this page is me! It is not;
I am not a font designer. Send kudos or criticism to
Michael
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, John Cowan wrote:
I am realizing that people think the "I" of this page is me! It is not;
I am not a font designer. Send kudos or criticism to
Michael Everson [EMAIL PROTECTED].
Sorry, I even didn't look at the sender's name! I thought it should have
been Michael
Hello, all. How do I print the superscript minus sign? The unicode for
this is \u207B. However, it is not printed correctly. Instead, it is an
unrecognized character. Thanks a lot.
Zhen Ren
Get Your Private, Free
-Original Message-
From: Tobias Schafhitzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 28, 2000 11:11 AM
To: Magda Danish (Unicode)
Subject: RE: Unicode konversion
Dear Magda Danish,
now there's a new problem. I have an UTF-16 Widecharacter string and want to
convert it to
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Christopher J. Fynn wrote:
Leaving aside implementation costs - has anyone ever come up with a good
estimate of the cost per character for the development of the Unicode / ISO
10646 standards in terms of man hours of experts and their long-suffering
secretaries, the
The call to WideCharToMultiByte takes a code page as an argument (if you
leave it blank it uses the default code page).
When you convert a string with Unicode characters to "multi-byte", you are
actually converting it to a legacy, non-Unicode, character set. Only the
characters actually
-Original Message-
From: Thomas Hartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, July 31, 2000 5:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: what is it ??
Hi ,
I am looking for the Unicode: 0x323ae0
Its an xml exception.
Can you give me a hand and find out what character it is ?
thanks
"Angelo Dalli" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Note that representing these two digraphs is fraught with problems,
especially due to the context sensitive capitalisation rules. gh at the
start of a word is capitalised as Gh while for an all-capitals word it is
written as GH. Similarly
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000, Angelo Dalli wrote:
These characters are the only two digraphs in the Maltese language, namely
the consonant 'gh' (where h is stroked) and the sixth vowel 'ie'. Though
these characters can be rendered onscreen using separate characters, they
are actually defined as
I interpreted this to mean that he wanted to be able to form two
different constructs using the same letters, e.g. i + e for an English
loan
word, but i + ZWJ + e for native Maltese words...
Rather than ZWJ, there is a pending proposal being considered by UTC for a
ZW GRAPHEME JOINER that
Mark Davis [EMAIL PROTECTED] or perhaps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Let me repeat your example. A UTF-16BE converter takes the codepoints
(aka scalar values)
code points: U+DC00 U+D800 U+DC00 U+D800 U+
Not exactly the same as my example, which didn't have the trailing
U+. But it
I have not been able to log in to the Unicode FTP site for several
days. Just a friendly note to the FTP administrators in case they
were not previously aware of any problems.
-Doug Ewell
Fullerton, California
I like the new layout of the Unicode Web site. It presents a clean,
uniform, and dignified look. I can't think of many Web sites that can
say the same.
I did find a typo, however. From the page titled "Technical Work" at
http://www.unicode.org/unicode/techwork.html:
The Unicode Standard was
14 matches
Mail list logo