En/Na [EMAIL PROTECTED] ha escrit:
Where are the Georgian digits?
They are the letters (as in Greek, Armenian, Hebrew, etc.)
I want a set of Georgian digits so I can use them as counter digits.
Look after URL:http://people.netscape.com/ftang/i18n.html#number
The theory have been explained
At 11:01 PM 8/7/00 -0800, Jianping Yang wrote:
Not really for Unicode in which we have relocated some codepoints for Hangul
between Unicode 1.1 and 2.0 :)
Regards,
Jianping.
"Christopher J. Fynn" wrote:
Allowing changes like this would break
existing implementations of these standards -
Asmus Freytag wrote:
The problem with the commission design of the euro glyph is that it only
works as long as you use their aspect ratio and uniform stroke width. As
long as you have these, the eye will complete them to a lower case 'e' form
and you will see an 'e'uro. As soon as you
Several questions:
1) Is the Arabic Joining Class information (i.e., that supplied in
ArabicShaping.txt and discussed on pg 192) considered to be normative or
informative?
2) U+0649 (ARABIC LETTER ALEF MAKSURA) has joining class "R", meaing in
common parlance that it has no initial or medial
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't need the word "ill" to look like Roman numeral
three.
That is supposed to be written « Ill », since this is a river.
I was told that the tavern there (Auberge de l'Ill) is one
of the better place to eat, by the way.
And yes, it is very difficult to grasp
Bob Hallissy wrote:
1) Is the Arabic Joining Class [...] normative or informative?
Like it or not, it is normative. See
http://www.unicode.org/Public/UNIDATA/UnicodeCharacterDatabase.html, that
reads:
...
ArabicShaping.txt (Section 8.2)
Basic Arabic and Syriac character shaping
Is not
http://www.hclrss.demon.co.uk/unicode/braille_patterns.html
or alternately
http://charts.unicode.org/Web/U2800.html
already covering this?
Note that the standard specifically does not try to give linguistic meaning
to braille, it is attempting to encode the current scheme of Braille.
Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
Is not
http://www.hclrss.demon.co.uk/unicode/braille_patterns.html
or alternately
http://charts.unicode.org/Web/U2800.html
already covering this?
No. These are at most the building blocks for braille. A better parallel
would be to consider these "presentation
On Wed, 9 Aug 2000 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
((( Personally, I think that this makes little sense. There is an even more
"minimal" shaping, that uses a single glyph for class "R" characters and 2
glyphs for most class "D" characters. Such an approach is used in the
Iranian standard charset,
I don't see anything in RFC 1766 that hardcodes it to the
1988 versions of either 639 or 3166.
I have taken this discussion off the Unicode list. I only started the thread
here because I was referencing an earlier post and because ISO 639 language
code updates were topical a couple months
Marco Cimarosti wrote about Unicode-Braille conversions.
This may be a very specialized use for Unicode, but it is
fascinating.
American Foundation for the Blind has a fact sheet about
Braille Technology for anyone else whose curiosity was
piqued:
11 matches
Mail list logo
