Unicode Transcriptions

2001-02-15 Thread Mark Davis
I am still missing Bopomofo, Khmer, Mongolian, Myanmar, Sinhala, Syriac, Thaana on http://www.macchiato.com/unicode/Unicode_transcriptions.html If anyone could supply one of these, I would appreciate it. Also, Ken suggested that the Bopomofo should be a Bopomofo transcription of the Chinese

RE: Unicode Transcriptions

2001-02-15 Thread ROBERT HODGSON
Dear colleagues, The American Bible Society is undertaking a prototype project which will bring an elementary Hebrew course online in the next year or so. We anticipate using the Unicode fonts to display the Hebrew characters. I would very much appreciate being in touch with other colleagues

remapping devanagari

2001-02-15 Thread Pam Lothspeich
Hello, I am a new user of unicode for devanagari (Hindi) in Microsoft Word. I am very impressed with this font, but I'm wondering if there is a way to remap the keyboard, so that I don't have to use shortcut keys which require multiple keystrokes in order to type devanagari. Also, I noticed

Re: Surrogate space in Unicode

2001-02-15 Thread jgo
At 2001-02-06 07:48:29 -0800 Mark Davis wrote: At 2001-02-06 01:51 "nikita k" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is surrogate space in unicode? It is the set of code points that can be addressed using surrogate code points. For more information, see the glossary at www.unicode.org. +

Re: Surrogate space in Unicode

2001-02-15 Thread DougEwell2
In a message dated 2001-02-15 15:26:55 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: At 2001-02-06 07:48:29 -0800 Mark Davis wrote: At 2001-02-06 01:51 "nikita k" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What is surrogate space in unicode? (Mark defines various terms relating to 'supplementary'

Re: Surrogate space in Unicode

2001-02-15 Thread Tom Lord
It has proven difficult to come up with convenient terms for the Unicode characters encoded at U+1 and beyond. [] 2. A 'basic' code point, which may represent a 'basic character', can range from U+ through U+. For what purpose is such a

Re: Surrogate space in Unicode

2001-02-15 Thread DougEwell2
In a message dated 2001-02-15 23:15:23 Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: It has proven difficult to come up with convenient terms for the Unicode characters encoded at U+1 and beyond. [] 2. A 'basic' code point, which may represent a 'basic character', can