On Tuesday, May 21, 2002, at 09:01 PM, James Kass wrote:
John H. Jenkins wrote:
I don't think that Code2000 is an OpenType font, which means it won't
have
the ancillary glyphs and data needed to do full proper support of many
languages and scripts.
Code2000 is an OpenType font with
Roozbeh Pournader wrote:
I was playing with something named 'Google sets', at:
http://labs1.google.com/sets
PS: I really don't know how did it find that 'You' thing. How
did it guess that I was connected with all three? :-}
When Big Brother is watching You, it's not difficult to
Michael Everson everson at evertype dot com wrote:
I thought these cases were more like the stop sign than the
square root sign, but I guess I didn't understand the policy
correctly.
I wouldn't overestimate the comprehensiveness of any such policy if
I were you. Symbols don't fit neatly
Shlomi Tal shlompi at hotmail dot com wrote:
And since emoticons are very useful, and are not compatibility
hacks, then why not add a few more to the Misc Symbols set? White
winking face, for example? I already use the white smiling face on
discussion boards, as an HTML NCR, and it's
Thank you for your reply.
I do feel I need to comment in regard to your two messages, totaling 19
KB, which are largely focused on the Private Use Area and quasi-official
codifications of its usage.
Well, the ideas are not intended to be quasi-official. Just one end user of
the Unicode system
USA Today ran a story yesterday on efforts to get cuneiform tablets published on the
web in dictionary, photographic and 3-D forms:
http://www.usatoday.com/news/healthscience/science/anthro/2002-05-21-cuneiform.htm
It mentions an encoding effort (which I am sure was mentioned on this list).
Doug Ewell wrote:
The smiling face and frowning face have fairly obvious value as
emoticons. I use U+263A (in its UCN form, \u263a) sometimes when
posting to this list. A winking face and a surprised or shocked
face could arguably be useful as well. But once you get past those
four, there's
At 05:57 AM 5/22/02, you wrote:
My responses inline. Thanks, -apurva
apurva:
Thanks for this confirmation.
Below are some input sequences, and I'm assuming that the font used for
displaying them will have a glyph for the khanda Ta. The sample conjunct
being created is taTa i.e. the double Ta.
8 matches
Mail list logo